From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822DF7E5; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="g/ITpJOC" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279867.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTP id 3BIMSimk021817; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:40:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references:from :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= qcppdkim1; bh=HPJ1/XXq0WbYT6CcNMr853jLJ6QLat6VOjsjdmg3ZTI=; b=g/ ITpJOCWQfkKu8Cq0aJ78v89YHGnXz4Mw5jRo0jckKy209/j6gtWMcbJkZW3kw2A9 1mggpJBRDSOX8BN8dEk2S/EceluQTsCW5FpCxe6BTT62SgMagyAGV3ClE0HHfoXu JB826gyL262hH36cAEuS+qRHJaGn068ho57LwKyn25Njxsb7Kza9VWDoRXLjDOmW W++ps3Lj8BfmPRQmCGrNG0PRqZoPKUKUlMqKkCrSZhv80wiy1NfVBcLt4EMpoJfA lHqKLaSY9lpH0gKs1gC+B7w6iem3VMf3r74gqhaUu8n7iyg0cmJwADrgBpxZmkoF 5XbrT7Q4wq2TdMnmFO/w== Received: from nalasppmta05.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3v2md2swum-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:40:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.196]) by NALASPPMTA05.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 3BJ0eb9G012093 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:40:37 GMT Received: from [10.239.132.204] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.40; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:40:32 -0800 Message-ID: <28496d0b-87db-4bab-9853-2073d9ad4c8a@quicinc.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:40:30 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: remove address/size-cells from mdss_dsi1 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , , , , , , CC: , , , References: <20231207092801.7506-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com> <20231207092801.7506-4-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com> <9cf61b7b-199a-4535-a701-10851959b940@linaro.org> From: Tengfei Fan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: G5-xXE1LLjDcHBiaoCatr1EoI5Sk8vVp X-Proofpoint-GUID: G5-xXE1LLjDcHBiaoCatr1EoI5Sk8vVp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-12-09_02,2023-12-07_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=858 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2312190002 在 12/18/2023 6:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道: > On 18/12/2023 10:59, Tengfei Fan wrote: >> >> >> 在 12/11/2023 6:25 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道: >>> On 07/12/2023 10:27, Tengfei Fan wrote: >>>> Address/size-cells will cause dtbs check warning, because mdss_dsi1 node >>>> have not ranges and child also have not reg, so remove address/size-cells. >>> >>> Paste the excerpt of warning. >> Sure, I will paste the excerpt of warning. >>> >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov >>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan >>>> --- >>> >>> I am not sure if this is correct. The address/size cells are there for >>> panels. We have multiple of such warnings, so I would like to have here >>> consensus for all of them. >> Currently these address/size cells lead to dtc W=1 warning, so these > > I know. > >> should be dropped. > > Why? They are correct. > >> These can be re-added if needed at a later date. > > Added where? These are rather properties of SoC. > > This does not solve any of my concerns. Hi Krzysztof, Sorry, a new patch has been submitted to upstream before seeing your reply. I will do more sync with internal teams, please ignore new patch series before we cannot solve your concerns. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- Thx and BRs, Tengfei Fan