From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755899AbcAMSTb (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:19:31 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47008 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755846AbcAMSTM (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:19:12 -0500
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
	Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
	Kingdom.
	Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1452707496.2683.14.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <1452707496.2683.14.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160112161449.GB4806@bender.nucleusys.com> <20160110203339.GE10864@localhost> <1452432410.2651.40.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160106134525.15633.73582.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <24185.1452126854@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1452180676.2890.21.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1601102135470.6161@namei.org> <2033.1452447990@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <30355.1452562693@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <30974.1452618524@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20160113163148.GA32533@bender.nucleusys.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mdb@juniper.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <28538.1452709150.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:19:10 +0000
Message-ID: <28539.1452709150@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> I beg to differ.  The IMA model is not broken with the current patches
> being upstreamed.  The basic concepts developed will continue to be
> used, perhaps not directly by IMA.

I still object to the change to x509_key_preparse() and still want it
reverting or removing.  It affects module signing too.

David