From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423747AbcFMNtO (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:49:14 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:58833 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1423299AbcFMNtN (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:49:13 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Takashi Iwai , Thorsten Leemhuis , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:53:20 +0200 Message-ID: <2854772.QvWZVI5fde@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.5.0-rc1+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160613133648.GB3717@pd.tnic> References: <20160613133648.GB3717@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, June 13, 2016 03:36:48 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Well, Rafael created a bugzilla entry for tracking in the past, so > > using bugzilla as tracking tool works in general. It doesn't mean > > it's the best option, of course, though. > > So I don't care whether it is buzgilla or some other central place which > can show you all regressions at once and Thorsten can edit it quickly so > that interested parties can get the latest status of a regression and > not waste time with stale emails. I used kernel BZ entries for two reasons. First, some of the bugs were in the kernel BZ already, so they could be added to the tracked list very easily when it was in BZ itself. Second, some people actually used BZ entries created by me to work on the bugs going forward (for storing logs, acpidumps and similar). Thanks, Rafael