From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: "José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
boris.brezillon@collabora.com, kees@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/tests: shmem: Fix intermittent DMA overflow on ppc64le/s390x
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 12:32:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <285af006-f403-4c3d-8cd6-e0318c188b85@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akd6NQvMG6-4sWQQ@fedora>
Hi José
Am 03.07.26 um 11:00 schrieb José Expósito:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 08:53:30AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 03.07.26 um 08:34 schrieb José Expósito:
>>> Two drm_gem_shmem KUnit tests, drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt() and
>>> drm_gem_shmem_test_purge(), intermittently fail on ppc64le and s390x CI
>>> with a DMA address overflow warning followed by -EIO:
>>>
>>> DMA addr 0x00000001130b0000+65536 overflow (mask ffffffff, bus limit 0).
>>> Expected sgt is not error, but is: -5
>>>
>>> Both tests call `drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt()`, which internally pins
>>> backing pages and DMA-maps them via `dma_map_sgtable()`. The DMA mapping
>>> path is:
>>>
>>> drm_gem_shmem_test_purge()
>>> drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt()
>>> drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt_locked() [drm_gem_shmem_helper.c]
>>> dma_map_sgtable() [mapping.c]
>>> __dma_map_sg_attrs()
>>> dma_direct_map_sg() [direct.c]
>>> dma_direct_map_phys() [kernel/dma/direct.h]
>>> dma_capable() Checks addr against DMA mask
>>> -> FAILS: addr > 0xFFFFFFFF
>>>
>>> KUnit devices are initialized with a 32-bit DMA mask
>>> (`DMA_BIT_MASK(32)`) in `lib/kunit/device.c`. On systems where the kernel
>>> allocates backing pages at physical addresses above 4GB, `dma_capable()`
>>> returns false because the address exceeds the 32-bit mask. The `dma_set_mask()`
>>> function updates `*dev->dma_mask` to the given value; setting it to
>>> `DMA_BIT_MASK(64)` allows any physical address to pass the check.
>>>
>>> The failure is intermittent because pages may or may not be allocated
>>> above 4GB on any given run depend on memory pressure.
>>>
>>> A third test in the same suite, `drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private`,
>>> already calls `dma_set_mask(drm_dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))` before its
>>> DMA mapping. This series applies the same fix to the two remaining tests.
>> Instead of doing whack-a-mole, is it possible to move the existing fix from
>> drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private() to _test_init at [1] ? The DMA mask
>> would then be the same on all tests. [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.2/source/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c#L359
> Yes, I think it is possible. However, this is an intermittent failure that
> I couldn't reproduce locally and I tried to reduce as much as possible the
> risk of regression limitting the change to the 2 affected tests.
>
> I'm afraid I don't have enough knoledge about GEM's internals to know if moving
> the fix to the init function could introduce unwanted side-effects in the other
> tests. If you think it'd be safe, I'll trust you and move it.
Please do. I don't see why it should not work, and it's an easy revert
it doesn't.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Jose
>
> PS - Next week I'll be away from keyboard, so any change would need to wait a bit
>
>> Best regards Thomas
>>> José Expósito (2):
>>> drm/tests: shmem: Set DMA mask to 64-bit in
>>> drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt
>>> drm/tests: shmem: Set DMA mask to 64-bit in drm_gem_shmem_test_purge
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>> --
>> --
>> Thomas Zimmermann
>> Graphics Driver Developer
>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>> Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
>> GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>>
>>
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 6:34 José Expósito
2026-07-03 6:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/tests: shmem: Set DMA mask to 64-bit in drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt José Expósito
2026-07-03 6:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/tests: shmem: Set DMA mask to 64-bit in drm_gem_shmem_test_purge José Expósito
2026-07-03 6:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm/tests: shmem: Fix intermittent DMA overflow on ppc64le/s390x Thomas Zimmermann
2026-07-03 9:00 ` José Expósito
2026-07-03 10:32 ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2026-07-03 14:30 ` José Expósito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=285af006-f403-4c3d-8cd6-e0318c188b85@suse.de \
--to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.exposito89@gmail.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®