Re: [PATCH] smp: Fix the comments of smp_call_function_many()

["Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>]

On 2021/12/14 2:05, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/12/21 7:57 PM, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
>> index 01a7c1706a58b1d..6ec884f41b7506d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -861,6 +861,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
>>  #define SCF_WAIT	(1U << 0)
>>  #define SCF_RUN_LOCAL	(1U << 1)
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * smp_call_function_many_cond(): Run a function on a set of CPUs.
>> + * @scf_flags: Bitmask that controls the operation. If %SCF_WAIT is set,
>> + *        wait (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs. If
>> + *        %SCF_RUN_LOCAL is set, the function will also be run locally
>> + *        if the local CPU is set in the @cpumask.
>> + */
> 
> Fixing up the smp_call_function_many() comment is a good idea.  But, the
> new smp_call_function_many_cond() comment duplicates these which are
> _just_ above it:

Yes, maybe we just need to list SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL here.

> 
>> /*
>>  * Flags to be used as scf_flags argument of smp_call_function_many_cond().
>>  *
>>  * %SCF_WAIT:           Wait until function execution is completed
>>  * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL:      Run also locally if local cpu is set in cpumask
>>  */
>> #define SCF_WAIT        (1U << 0)
>> #define SCF_RUN_LOCAL   (1U << 1)
> 
> Could we comment the bits in one place?

Yes, I think we should delete the line "Flags to be used ..."

> .
>