From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266547AbUHBNRK (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:17:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266525AbUHBNPX (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:15:23 -0400 Received: from mail.lastar.com ([65.89.139.10]:17164 "HELO server11.lastar.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266523AbUHBNOz (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:14:55 -0400 Message-ID: <2873B794CB1BE04F80E2968B438680E503C8C991@server6.ctg.com> From: Jason Gauthier To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: RE: 2.6.7 SMP trouble? Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:14:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry for the delay in reponse to this thread. I've been testing this out, and it takes awhile. Well, sadly, I was *wrong*. After a couple days my 2.4.26 kernel completely died on me too. So, I back tracked to 2.4.22, which I had previously thought stable. But no, it also died. So, I started at the beginning. Here are my results: 2.4.0-2.4.9: Do not compile. 2.4.10-2.4.15: 'Oops' on boot. 2.4.16-2.4.17: skipped 2.4.18: Same SMP symptoms. So, I could try 16/17, but I don't think it matter much at this point. What should my next step be? Thanks for all the help so far. Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Zwane Mwaikambo [mailto:zwane@fsmlabs.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:35 AM > To: Jason Gauthier > Cc: Linux Kernel > Subject: RE: 2.6.7 SMP trouble? > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Jason Gauthier wrote: > > > > It would actually help if you found the exact version > which stopped > > > working, then we can get it looked at and fixed. > > > > > > > If it's in the middle of 2.5 development somewhere that > could take me > > months > > :) > > Assuming 1 day to download compile and start the tests, > it's about a > > day per kernel. > > Try the following kernels; > > 2.6.0 > 2.5.65 > 2.5.60 > > Basically just make large strides, due to the lack of other > data this may be the only way. >