From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314361AbSEBLzR>; Thu, 2 May 2002 07:55:17 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314378AbSEBLzQ>; Thu, 2 May 2002 07:55:16 -0400
Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:54546 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S314361AbSEBLzQ>;
	Thu, 2 May 2002 07:55:16 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: m.knoblauch@teraport.de
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The tainted message 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 2002 09:35:36 +0200."
             <3CD0EC48.A0F13F53@TeraPort.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:55:04 +1000
Message-ID: <28821.1020340504@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 02 May 2002 09:35:36 +0200, 
Martin Knoblauch <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de> wrote:
> purely technical question: does this work with the "compatible" license
>strings without making them incompatible? E.g. would this be a
>compatible license:
>
>MODULE_LICENSE("GPL - contact someone@somewhere for support");

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=99926682329331&w=2