mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dong-Jae Kang <baramsori72@gmail.com>
To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: righi.andrea@gmail.com, menage@google.com,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, agk@sourceware.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, chlunde@ping.uio.no,
	dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dpshah@google.com,
	eric.rannaud@gmail.com, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, matt@bluehost.com,
	dradford@bluehost.com, ngupta@google.com,
	randy.dunlap@oracle.com, roberto@unbit.it,
	s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp, nauman@google.com,
	fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corsetproject@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] range-bw: Another I/O scheduling policy of dm-ioband  supporting the predicable I/O bandwidth (range bandwidth)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 20:23:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2891419e0905040423y27f25ce7y61e5211aded85f99@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430.165310.226796026.ryov@valinux.co.jp>

Hi, Ryo

I released bug-fixed range-bw(V1) controller several minutes ago

Although several WARNINGs of checkpatch are remained,
but patch file was strictly checked by checkpatch.pl
It was very time-consuming job :)
Thank you for your advice

>>
>> > I used fio 1.22. The below is a script which I actually ran.
>> >
>> >  #!/bin/sh
>> >  dev1=/dev/sdb4 # SATA disk
>> >  echo "0 $(sudo blockdev --getsize $dev1) ioband $dev1 share2 0 0
>> >    cgroup range-bw 0" | sudo dmsetup create ioband1
>> >
>> >  arg="--time_based --runtime=10 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=50 \
>> >       --direct=1 --norandommap"
>> >
>> >  dmsetup message ioband1 0 attach 2
>> >  dmsetup message ioband1 0 attach 3
>> >  dmsetup message ioband1 0 min-bw 2:100
>> >  dmsetup message ioband1 0 max-bw 2:100
>> >  dmsetup message ioband1 0 min-bw 3:200
>> >  dmsetup message ioband1 0 max-bw 3:200
>>
>> I recommend it is better to use different value in min-bw and max-bw
>> because its concept is to support range-bw with the minimum
>> guaranteeing and maximum limitation.
>> exampe - min-bw : 1024 / max-bw : 3072
>>
>> >  echo $$ > /cgroup/grp1/tasks
>> >  fio $arg --rw=randread --name=grp1 --filename=/dev/mapper/ioband1 \
>> >          --output=r2-1.log &
>> >  echo $$ > /cgroup/grp2/tasks
>> >  fio $arg --rw=randread --name=grp2 --filename=/dev/mapper/ioband1 \
>> >          --output=r2-2.log &
>> >  wait

after bug-fix,I evaluated range-bw according to your configuration and
test environment
the result is in new relesed range-bw mail, [PATCH 0/2]
and more detailed documentation is also available and it can be
referred in [PATCH 1/2]

Ryo,
can you check the result ?

> bio-cgroup is renamed to bklio-cgroup. :)
> I don't clearly understand about range-bw but I think that you don't
> need to consider to support them and it should be taken care of by
> blkio-cgroup and the common part of dm-ioband, not the policy
> implementation. Do you have any problems with AIO or delayed write?

if you are interested in range-bw, more information is available to you
and any questions and comments about range-bw is always welcom.  :)

Ryo,
blkio-cgroup can be applied to dm-ioband ver1.10.3 without modification?
I didn't check blkio-cgroup yet.

Thank you
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Dong-Jae Kang
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Dong-Jae Kang

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-04 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23  9:10 Dong-Jae Kang
2009-04-24  9:58 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-04-27  8:58   ` Dong-Jae Kang
2009-04-27 11:12     ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-04-30  5:15       ` Dong-Jae Kang
2009-04-30  7:53         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-04 11:23           ` Dong-Jae Kang [this message]
2009-05-04 22:36             ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-06  0:35               ` Dong-Jae Kang
2009-05-12 11:30                 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-15  7:00                   ` Dong-Jae Kang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2891419e0905040423y27f25ce7y61e5211aded85f99@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=baramsori72@gmail.com \
    --cc=agk@sourceware.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chlunde@ping.uio.no \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corsetproject@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=dradford@bluehost.com \
    --cc=eric.rannaud@gmail.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=matt@bluehost.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=ngupta@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=roberto@unbit.it \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®