mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 柳菁峰 <liujingfeng@qianxin.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"syzkaller@googlegroups.com" <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: 答复: Found a memory leak in kvm module
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 07:04:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2895069420eb4af3a3b3a949af4010f3@qianxin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5tkpxOiDoF0X/On@google.com>

I had tried to retest with your patch,and I think the memory leak was resolved by it.
Thanks!

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Sean Christopherson [mailto:seanjc@google.com] 
发送时间: 2022年12月16日 2:17
收件人: 柳菁峰 <liujingfeng@qianxin.com>
抄送: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; pbonzini@redhat.com; syzkaller@googlegroups.com
主题: Re: Found a memory leak in kvm module

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 柳菁峰 wrote:
> Hello,I have found a memory leak bug in kvm module by syzkaller.It was 
> found in linux-5.4 but it also could be reproduced in the latest linux version.

Ah, I assume by "linux-5.4" you mean "stable v5.4.x kernels that contain commit
7d1bc32d6477 ("KVM: Stop looking for coalesced MMIO zones if the bus is destroyed")", because without that fix I can't see any bug that would affect both 5.4 and the upstream kernel.

If my assumption is correct, then I'm 99% certain the issue is that the target device isn't destroyed if allocating the new bus fails.  I haven't had luck with the automatic fault injection, but was able to confirm a leak with this hack.

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 13e88297f999..22d9ab1b5c25 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -5424,7 +5424,7 @@ int kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_bus bus_idx,
                              struct kvm_io_device *dev)  {
        int i, j;
-       struct kvm_io_bus *new_bus, *bus;
+       struct kvm_io_bus *new_bus = NULL, *bus;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
 
@@ -5441,6 +5441,7 @@ int kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_bus bus_idx,
        if (i == bus->dev_count)
                return 0;
 
+       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64))
        new_bus = kmalloc(struct_size(bus, range, bus->dev_count - 1),
                          GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
        if (new_bus) {


The fix is to destroy the target device before bailing.  I'll send a proper patch either way, but it would be nice to get confirmation that this is the same bug that you hit with "linux-5.4".

Thanks!

---
 virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c index 0be80c213f7f..5ef88f5a0864 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/coalesced_mmio.c
@@ -187,15 +187,17 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_coalesced_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
 			r = kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm,
 				zone->pio ? KVM_PIO_BUS : KVM_MMIO_BUS, &dev->dev);
 
+			kvm_iodevice_destructor(&dev->dev);
+
 			/*
 			 * On failure, unregister destroys all devices on the
 			 * bus _except_ the target device, i.e. coalesced_zones
-			 * has been modified.  No need to restart the walk as
-			 * there aren't any zones left.
+			 * has been modified.  Bail after destroying the target
+			 * device, there's no need to restart the walk as there
+			 * aren't any zones left.
 			 */
 			if (r)
 				break;
-			kvm_iodevice_destructor(&dev->dev);
 		}
 	}
 

base-commit: 0f30b25edea48433eb32448990557364436818e6
-- 

      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-19  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-12  3:07 柳菁峰
2022-12-15 18:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-19  7:04   ` 柳菁峰 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2895069420eb4af3a3b3a949af4010f3@qianxin.com \
    --to=liujingfeng@qianxin.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®