mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Russ Weight <russ.weight@linux.dev>,
	 Danilo Krummrich	 <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Michal Grzedzicki	 <mge@meta.com>,
	driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware_loader: allow firmware_class.path to take multiple paths
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 07:34:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28b06032286beed696b0e95f9e96247cfd3ff667.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026031940-baritone-handsaw-f1d3@gregkh>

On Thu, 2026-03-19 at 07:23 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 03:54:02PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Refactor fw_get_filesystem_firmware() by extracting the per-path
> > firmware loading logic into a new fw_try_firmware_path() helper.
> > 
> > Use this helper to parse fw_path_para for ':'-separated paths,
> > trying each one before falling through to the default firmware
> > search paths. This allows users to specify multiple custom firmware
> > directories via firmware_class.path, e.g.:
> > 
> >   firmware_class.path=/custom/path1:/custom/path2
> > 
> > A backslash can be used as an escape character, allowing a literal
> > ':' ("\:") or literal '\' ("\\") to be embedded in a pathname.
> 
> This is a mess, what could go wrong embedding another parser in the
> kernel :)
> 
> Let's step back, why is this needed at all?  The kernel already supports
> multiple standard locations for firmware paths, and one custom location.
> Why do we now need more than that?  What changed to require this and who
> is going to use it (and support it, and actually test it?)
> 

We have at least one internal user that requested the ability to do
this. I'll see if they can articulate their use-case better.

> We really want to make the number of firmware paths less, not more.  But
> if we _really_ need multiple paths, isn't it simpler to just have an
> array of paths here, not be forced to parse escape codes like you are
> now doing?
> 

How would one feed an array of paths to the module without delimiting
them in some fashion?
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18 19:54 Jeff Layton
2026-03-19  6:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-19 11:34   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-03-19 11:39     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-19 11:47       ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-19 12:04         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-19 14:13         ` Michal Grzedzicki
2026-03-19 15:30           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-19 15:51             ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28b06032286beed696b0e95f9e96247cfd3ff667.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mge@meta.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=russ.weight@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®