mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hoo <robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
	Yong He <zhuangel570@gmail.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Add "never" option to allow sticky disabling of nx_huge_pages
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:06:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28bd9d11-282f-bb22-66f5-d3d9165d4adf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602005859.784190-1-seanjc@google.com>

On 6/2/2023 8:58 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Add a "never" option to the nx_huge_pages module param to allow userspace
> to do a one-way hard disabling of the mitigation, and don't create the
> per-VM recovery threads when the mitigation is hard disabled.  Letting
> userspace pinky swear that userspace doesn't want to enable NX mitigation
> (without reloading KVM) allows certain use cases to avoid the latency
> problems associated with spawning a kthread for each VM.
> 
> E.g. in FaaS use cases, the guest kernel is trusted and the host may
> create 100+ VMs per logical CPU, which can result in 100ms+ latencies when
> a burst of VMs is created.
> 
> Reported-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1679555884-32544-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com
> Cc: Yong He <zhuangel570@gmail.com>
> Cc: Robert Hoo <robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index c8961f45e3b1..2ed38916b904 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
>   
>   extern bool itlb_multihit_kvm_mitigation;
>   
> +static bool nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled;
> +
>   int __read_mostly nx_huge_pages = -1;
>   static uint __read_mostly nx_huge_pages_recovery_period_ms;
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> @@ -67,12 +69,13 @@ static uint __read_mostly nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio = 0;
>   static uint __read_mostly nx_huge_pages_recovery_ratio = 60;
>   #endif
>   
> +static int get_nx_huge_pages(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp);
>   static int set_nx_huge_pages(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp);
>   static int set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_param(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp);
>   
>   static const struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_ops = {
>   	.set = set_nx_huge_pages,
> -	.get = param_get_bool,
> +	.get = get_nx_huge_pages,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct kernel_param_ops nx_huge_pages_recovery_param_ops = {
> @@ -6844,6 +6847,14 @@ static void mmu_destroy_caches(void)
>   	kmem_cache_destroy(mmu_page_header_cache);
>   }
>   
> +static int get_nx_huge_pages(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> +{
> +	if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
> +		return sprintf(buffer, "never\n");
> +
> +	return param_get_bool(buffer, kp);
> +}
> +
>   static bool get_nx_auto_mode(void)
>   {
>   	/* Return true when CPU has the bug, and mitigations are ON */
> @@ -6860,15 +6871,29 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
>   	bool old_val = nx_huge_pages;
>   	bool new_val;
>   
> +	if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
>   	/* In "auto" mode deploy workaround only if CPU has the bug. */
> -	if (sysfs_streq(val, "off"))
> +	if (sysfs_streq(val, "off")) {
>   		new_val = 0;
> -	else if (sysfs_streq(val, "force"))
> +	} else if (sysfs_streq(val, "force")) {
>   		new_val = 1;
> -	else if (sysfs_streq(val, "auto"))
> +	} else if (sysfs_streq(val, "auto")) {
>   		new_val = get_nx_auto_mode();
> -	else if (kstrtobool(val, &new_val) < 0)
> +	} else if (sysfs_streq(val, "never")) {
> +		new_val = 0;
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&kvm_lock);
> +		if (!list_empty(&vm_list)) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		}
> +		nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled = true;
> +		mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
> +	} else if (kstrtobool(val, &new_val) < 0) {
>   		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> 

IIUC, (Initially) "auto_off"/"off" --> create some VM --> turn to "never", 
the created VMs still have those kthreads, but can never be used, until 
destroyed with VM.

Is this designed/accepted pattern?

>   	__set_nx_huge_pages(new_val);
>   
> @@ -7006,6 +7031,9 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_param(const char *val, const struct kernel
>   	uint old_period, new_period;
>   	int err;
>   
> +	if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
>   	was_recovery_enabled = calc_nx_huge_pages_recovery_period(&old_period);
>   
>   	err = param_set_uint(val, kp);
> @@ -7161,6 +7189,9 @@ int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>   {
>   	int err;
>   
> +	if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	err = kvm_vm_create_worker_thread(kvm, kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker, 0,
>   					  "kvm-nx-lpage-recovery",
>   					  &kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> 
> base-commit: 39428f6ea9eace95011681628717062ff7f5eb5f


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-02  0:58 Sean Christopherson
2023-06-02  6:06 ` Robert Hoo [this message]
2023-06-02 15:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-03  0:54     ` Robert Hoo
2023-06-06  9:47     ` Huang, Kai
2023-06-05  4:26 ` Li,Rongqing
2023-06-06 20:26 ` Luiz Capitulino
2023-06-06 22:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-07  2:08     ` Luiz Capitulino
2023-06-13 23:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-14 13:20   ` Luiz Capitulino
2023-06-14 19:07     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-11 16:12       ` Like Xu
2023-07-12 23:47         ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28bd9d11-282f-bb22-66f5-d3d9165d4adf@gmail.com \
    --to=robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=zhuangel570@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome