From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
james.morse@arm.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
fenghuay@nvidia.com, gshan@redhat.com, jic23@kernel.org,
zengheng4@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm_mpam: resctrl: Limit num_rmids to the CLOSIDs in use
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 11:01:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28cbd086-af52-47c4-9e71-6957ab8caf76@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106081923.2333070-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Hi Jinjie,
On 06/11/2026 08:19, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> On MPAM an RMID is a PMG within a PARTID, so resctrl can only allocate
> the PMGs of the CLOSIDs it uses. info/L3_MON/num_rmids is instead set
> to the whole PARTID and PMG space when the monitors are initialised,
> and halved when CDP is enabled. It reports more RMIDs than resctrl can
> allocate in two cases:
>
> - With CDP each CLOSID takes two PARTIDs, and resctrl halves the
> CLOSID count rounding down, while MPAM halves the whole RMID space.
> With 5 PARTIDs and 2 PMGs resctrl has 2 CLOSIDs and 4 RMIDs, but
> num_rmids reads 5. The count is too high whenever the number of
> PARTIDs is odd and there is more than one PMG.
>
> - On a monitor-only system there are no control groups and resctrl
> only uses the default CLOSID, but num_rmids still covers every
> PARTID. With 5 PARTIDs and 2 PMGs it reads 10 while only 2 RMIDs
> can be allocated.
>
> RMID allocation is limited to the CLOSIDs in use, so only the value
> reported to userspace is too high. Creating as many monitor groups as
> num_rmids allows fails with -ENOSPC before that number is reached.
>
> Work out the number of CLOSIDs with the rules resctrl applies when it
> is mounted: schemata_list_add() halves a resource's CLOSID count
> while CDP is enabled on it, rounding down, closid_init() takes the
> smallest across the resources, and a monitor-only system has only the
> default CLOSID. Report (pmg_max + 1) RMIDs for each of those CLOSIDs,
> counting at monitor initialisation and from
> resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(), which resctrl calls whenever a mount
> or unmount enables or disables CDP.
>
> Fixes: 264c285999fc ("arm_mpam: resctrl: Add monitor initialisation and domain boilerplate")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 7.1.x
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
> Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Drop resctrl_arch_set_mon_rmid_count() and count the CLOSIDs in the
> MPAM driver instead, as Ben suggested.
> - v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261105123304.2281987-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> v2:
> - Also fix num_rmids on monitor-only systems, as Ben suggested.
> - Retitle from "arm_mpam: Round the CDP RMID count down to whole CLOSIDs".
> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261104101622.563280-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> index 5468367776e2..6859849f299b 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,34 @@ static void mpam_resctrl_monitor_sync_abmc_vals(struct rdt_resource *l3)
> */
> }
>
> +/* The RMID count follows the CLOSIDs resctrl uses. */
> +static void mpam_resctrl_set_num_rmid(void)
> +{
> + struct mpam_resctrl_res *res = &mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_L3];
> + struct rdt_resource *l3 = &res->resctrl_res;
> + enum resctrl_res_level rid;
> + u32 num_closid = UINT_MAX;
> +
> + for_each_mpam_resctrl_control(res, rid) {
> + u32 res_num_closid;
> +
> + if (!res->resctrl_res.alloc_capable)
> + continue;
> +
> + res_num_closid = mpam_partid_max + 1;
> + if (res->cdp_enabled)
> + res_num_closid /= 2;
> +
> + num_closid = min(num_closid, res_num_closid);
> + }
There are global variables mpam_partid_max, cdp_enabled and a helper resctrl_arch_alloc_capable().
Using these should make this simpler.
> +
> + /* Monitor-only systems have only the default CLOSID. */
> + if (num_closid == UINT_MAX)
> + num_closid = 1;
> +
> + l3->mon.num_rmid = (mpam_pmg_max + 1) * num_closid;
> +}
> +
> int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable)
> {
> u32 partid_i = RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID, partid_d = RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID;
> @@ -217,11 +245,6 @@ int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable)
> cdp_enabled = enable;
> mpam_resctrl_controls[rid].cdp_enabled = enable;
>
> - if (enable)
> - l3->mon.num_rmid = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx() / 2;
> - else
> - l3->mon.num_rmid = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
> -
> /* The mbw_max feature can't hide cdp as it's a per-partid maximum. */
> if (cdp_enabled && !mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].cdp_enabled)
> mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].resctrl_res.alloc_capable = false;
> @@ -238,6 +261,8 @@ int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable)
> if (!cdp_enabled && mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].class)
> mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].resctrl_res.alloc_capable = true;
>
> + mpam_resctrl_set_num_rmid();
> +
Why move the location of where num_rmid is set?
Thanks,
Ben
> if (enable) {
> if (mpam_partid_max < 1)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1344,15 +1369,7 @@ static int mpam_resctrl_monitor_init(struct mpam_resctrl_mon *mon,
> l3->name = "L3";
> l3->mon_scope = RESCTRL_L3_CACHE;
>
> - /*
> - * num-rmid is the upper bound for the number of monitoring groups that
> - * can exist simultaneously, including the default monitoring group for
> - * each control group. Hence, advertise the whole rmid_idx space even
> - * though each control group has its own pmg/rmid space. Unfortunately,
> - * this does mean userspace needs to know the architecture to correctly
> - * interpret this value.
> - */
> - l3->mon.num_rmid = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
> + mpam_resctrl_set_num_rmid();
>
> if (type == QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID) {
> int err;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 8:19 Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-06 11:01 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28cbd086-af52-47c4-9e71-6957ab8caf76@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®