From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Be friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 01:27:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2902116.OdbNv5KQzQ@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140526205337.1100.55275.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Hi Srivatsa,
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 02:23:38 AM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Cpufreq governors like the ondemand governor calculate the load on the CPU
> periodically by employing deferrable timers. A deferrable timer won't fire
> if the CPU is completely idle (and there are no other timers to be run), in
> order to avoid unnecessary wakeups and thus save CPU power.
>
> However, the load calculation logic is agnostic to all this, and this can
> lead to the problem described below.
This is subtle enough that I need some more time to chew on it, but since the
merge window is coming, I'm not sure when that's going to happen honestly.
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-26 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 20:53 Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-05-26 23:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-05-27 3:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-02 7:33 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2014-06-02 8:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-03 5:16 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2014-06-03 5:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-03 8:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 9:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-03 9:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 10:04 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-03 10:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 10:13 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-03 10:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 10:16 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-07 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2014-06-07 12:35 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2902116.OdbNv5KQzQ@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®