From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] thermal/core: Emit a warning if the thermal zone is updated without ops
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:53:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <292183a9-deef-b8fe-c3a8-3ee39211808d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209153440.27643-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 12/9/20 3:34 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The actual code is silently ignoring a thermal zone update when a
> driver is requesting it without a get_temp ops set.
>
> That looks not correct, as the caller should not have called this
> function if the thermal zone is unable to read the temperature.
>
> That makes the code less robust as the check won't detect the driver
> is inconsistently using the thermal API and that does not help to
> improve the framework as these circumvolutions hide the problem at the
> source.
>
> In order to detect the situation when it happens, let's add a warning
> when the update is requested without the get_temp() ops set.
>
> Any warning emitted will have to be fixed at the source of the
> problem: the caller must not call thermal_zone_device_update if there
> is not get_temp callback set.
>
> Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
> Cc: Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index dee40ff41177..afc02e7d1045 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,8 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> if (atomic_read(&in_suspend))
> return;
>
> - if (!tz->ops->get_temp)
> + if (WARN_ONCE(!tz->ops->get_temp, "'%s' must not be called without "
> + "'get_temp' ops set\n", __FUNCTION__))
> return;
>
> update_temperature(tz);
>
With this RFC and the link that you gave me in previous thread, I see
the motivation.
I would change __FUNCTION__ into __func__, but other than that LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Regards,
Lukasz
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 15:34 Daniel Lezcano
2020-12-09 15:34 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] thermal/core: Add critical and hot ops Daniel Lezcano
2020-12-10 9:28 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-12-09 15:34 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] thermal/drivers/acpi: Use hot and critical ops Daniel Lezcano
2020-12-09 15:34 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] thermal/core: Remove notify ops Daniel Lezcano
2020-12-09 15:53 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=292183a9-deef-b8fe-c3a8-3ee39211808d@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®