mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, briannorris@chromium.org,
	heiko@sntech.de, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	dianders@chromium.org, tfiga@chromium.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	seanpaul@chromium.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] driver core: Move device_links_purge() after bus_remove_device()
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:17:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2944574.zGy8XCJarq@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171020062201.GA18761@kroah.com>

On Friday, October 20, 2017 8:22:01 AM CEST Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:22:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, October 20, 2017 3:23:16 AM CEST Jeffy Chen wrote:
> > > The current ordering of code in device_del() triggers a WARN_ON()
> > > in device_links_purge(), because of an unexpected link status.
> > > 
> > > The device_links_unbind_consumers() call in device_release_driver()
> > > has to take place before device_links_purge() for the status of all
> > > links to be correct, so move the device_links_purge() call in
> > > device_del() after the invocation of bus_remove_device() which calls
> > > device_release_driver().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > 
> > OK, thanks.
> > 
> > Greg, will you take this?
> 
> Yes I will.  But I don't understand if this is a bugfix that needs to go
> to all stable kernels to resolve a problem that has always been there,
> or it is ok for 4.15-rc1, as it's just a "do things in the correct
> order" type of change.
> 
> Any hints?

Technically the problem has always been there, but it is only visible if
device links are used in a specific way and I'm not sure whether or not
there is any code in the tree where that's the case.

That said AFAICS it should be safe to add

Fixes: 9ed9895370ae (driver core: Functional dependencies tracking support)

to it and handle it accordingly.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-20 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-20  1:23 Jeffy Chen
2017-10-20  1:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-20  6:22   ` Greg KH
2017-10-20 11:17     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-10-20 12:01       ` jeffy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2944574.zGy8XCJarq@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®