mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
To: 7eggert@gmx.de
Cc: "Daniel Marjamäki" <daniel.marjamaki@comhem.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I made a patch and would like feedback/testers (drivers/cdrom/aztcd.c)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:07:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29495f1d0511201307n29fd2095md0d9543d5aef9968@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1EdwGs-0000qv-NL@be1.lrz>

On 11/20/05, Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org> wrote:
> Daniel Marjamäki <daniel.marjamaki@comhem.se> wrote:
>
> > -     aztTimeOutCount = 0;
> > +     aztTimeOut = jiffies + 2;
>
> Different timeout based on HZ seems wrong.

True; I'm trying to think of a good way to emulate 8000000 iterations
of loop, though. Really, this is not terrible to use 2 jiffies of
offset, as we try to sleep 1 jiffy each time. As long as we don't get
a signal *right* away, we'll sleep probably for 2 loops. Not sure,
though, may be useful to see what happens in practice and then debug
further for the right value.

May also want to use time_after_eq() not time_after().

Thanks,
Nish

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-20 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5aZsv-3CJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-11-20 20:58 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-11-20 21:07   ` Nish Aravamudan [this message]
2005-11-21  8:09   ` Daniel Marjamäki
2005-11-21  8:19     ` Con Kolivas
2005-11-21  8:42       ` Daniel Marjamäki
2005-11-21  9:11         ` Con Kolivas
2005-11-21 10:47           ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-21 15:08             ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-11-21 16:33       ` Bodo Eggert
2005-11-20 15:29 Daniel Marjamäki
2005-11-20 15:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-20 17:15   ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-11-20 21:04   ` Nish Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29495f1d0511201307n29fd2095md0d9543d5aef9968@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
    --cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
    --cc=daniel.marjamaki@comhem.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®