From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763297AbXGLTIc (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:08:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756165AbXGLTIY (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:08:24 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.187]:45655 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755631AbXGLTIX (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:08:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Q81uxqXtjfJkLxAoqqHGZI7KyIBKnK84GUuYZFVxK7mnxDLLR7Oq6xnxk64I62TDtySJNtP99seMB8KBm14imQc/eOneC18wRBwww5AjRIbN712aAq6cDt6vA/4iAYJ+thzHmpFg+YIyt2ruHI2GNxzObW0rw9Fp3TmdJd9dfgg= Message-ID: <29495f1d0707121208q4e8f2f16w45c65a3bd94c0a66@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:08:21 -0700 From: "Nish Aravamudan" To: "Chris Wright" Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.22.1 Cc: "Greg KH" , "Andrew Morton" , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070712185219.GR4306@sequoia.sous-sol.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070710200637.GA5881@kroah.com> <29495f1d0707121135u2a07cf04nb8bfe555c5c63679@mail.gmail.com> <20070712184106.GA22849@kroah.com> <29495f1d0707121146k7b3a7175l1fcb40877e59cfaf@mail.gmail.com> <20070712185219.GR4306@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/12/07, Chris Wright wrote: > * Nish Aravamudan (nish.aravamudan@gmail.com) wrote: > > On 7/12/07, Greg KH wrote: > > > That is a tree that Chris did, and I didn't realize we were maintaining > > > it as the "official" stable tree, that is why it is not mentioned in the > > > release notes :) > > > > Fair enough -- it's just a little bit easier from my side for > > mirroring to only have to mirror one tree rather simply rather than > > pulling multiple trees into one (and thus having to add to the list as > > time goes on). > > > > > I'll let Chris decide if he wishes to maintain it or not, Chris? > > Nish, I think you might be the only user ;-) I never figured out a nice > way to do this w/out having a coherency issue (well, triggers aside). > Ideally git would allow for something more transparent than > alternatives, actual moving view to another tree. It's possible with > links, but that seems just dirty. Short of that, do folks find the tree > useful? If so, I can work on some better automation to keep it > up-to-date. Well, if I'm the only one, I can work on something on my side :) Thanks for the heads-up. -Nish