From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765422AbXHAPwX (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:52:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752498AbXHAPwG (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:52:06 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.185]:62329 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759926AbXHAPwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:52:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BoXgOg8a17PVEgFBLryaIhqUCyaKbu8miyC+tGH4n7+PXarifM1kzoT2r57BynRStlSona8XDtNxgw1sFnFE6igif1uR5VLyMAbQGGs6d3u2yBXgTSuR7u+5NN3b2Ji6gHT2/zW4iDvKHQ/edwjJObwjgx7vmA5nZ63tF07nZu4= Message-ID: <29495f1d0708010852p8eacbadjabc33332a097e44a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:52:02 -0700 From: "Nish Aravamudan" To: "Randy Dunlap" Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 huge pages VM freeze (maybe?) Cc: "Zan Lynx" , "Linux Kernel" In-Reply-To: <46B0ACC5.6010904@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1185918261.6981.13.camel@localhost> <20070731150245.5932b763.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <29495f1d0708010845x446f7823qcfe2c5244b604078@mail.gmail.com> <46B0ACC5.6010904@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/1/07, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 7/31/07, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote: > >> > >>> I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small programs like > >>> "ls" work fine. I tried running Evolution through libhugetlbfs and the > >>> system slowly stops running. One interesting thing is the "ps" command, > >>> it gets stuck like this: > >> Do you mean 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 or 2.6.23-rc1-mm1? > >> > >> There was a hugepage problem fixed very recently, in 2.6.23-rc1 IIRC. > > > > Actually fixed just after 2.6.23-rc1: > > > > git describe 5ab3ee7b1cd5c91eb2272764f9d7d1fe4749681e > > v2.6.23-rc1-14-g5ab3ee7 > > Looks to me like Andrew included Ken's patch in his rc1-mm1 anyway, > so that shouldn't be the issue. Or did I not read mm/hugetlb.c correctly? Yeah you're right, the -mm tree has that bug fixed. Thanks, Nish