From: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: next-20130709 DMAR issues
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:01:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29624.1373475702@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3180 bytes --]
Dell Latitude E6530.
Seeing a new error message crop up in next-0709 that wasn't there with 0703.
Particularly odd, last person to touch dmar.c was on 05/20/2013, so no smoking
guns there...
egrep -i 'dmar|linux ver' /var/log/messages gives me:
Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.10.0-next-20130703 (valdis@turing-police.cc.vt.edu) (gcc version 4.8.1 20130612 (Red Hat 4.8.1-2) (GCC) ) #99 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 3 17:40:09 EDT 2013
Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] ACPI: DMAR 00000000cb7fd298 00080 (v01 INTEL SNB 00000001 INTL 00000001)
Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021530] dmar: Host address width 36
Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021536] dmar: DRHD base: 0x000000fed90000 flags: 0x1
Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021569] dmar: IOMMU 0: reg_base_addr fed90000 ver 1:0 cap c9008020660262 ecap f0105a
Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021576] dmar: RMRR base: 0x000000ce761000 end: 0x000000ce780fff
Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 1.023235] DMAR: No ATSR found
That's what it usually says. But now I have:
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.10.0-next-20130709 (valdis@turing-police.cc.vt.edu) (gcc version 4.8.1 20130612 (Red Hat 4.8.1-2) (GCC) ) #100 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jul 9 16:01:59 EDT 2013
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] ACPI: DMAR 00000000cb7fd298 00080 (v01 INTEL SNB 00000001 INTL 00000001)
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021453] dmar: Host address width 36
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021456] dmar: DRHD base: 0x000000fed90000 flags: 0x1
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021485] dmar: IOMMU 0: reg_base_addr fed90000 ver 1:0 cap c9008020660262 ecap f0105a
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021487] dmar: RMRR base: 0x000000ce761000 end: 0x000000ce780fff
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021575] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021583] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [00:1f.2] fault addr ce71d000
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021583] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 1.034643] DMAR: No ATSR found
Now I have 3 extra messages talking about handling a fault status. lspci says 00:1f.2 is:
00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 04)
I found similar in a thread here: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1212.1/02319.html
which ended with Don Dutile saying:
"DMAR table does not have an entry for this device to this region.
Once the driver reconfigs/resets the device to stop polling bios-boot
cmd rings and use (new) OS (dma-mapped) rings, there's a period of time
during this transition that the hw is babbling away to an area that is no
longer mapped."
But I'm not convinced this is the same issue - why did it change between 0703 and 0709,
when I haven't updated the firmware. No relevant .config changes between the two, either.
If this doesn't ring any bells, I'l go do the bisect thing...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 865 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-10 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 17:01 Valdis Kletnieks [this message]
2013-07-12 12:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-12 14:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-07-15 2:32 ` Li, Zhen-Hua
2013-07-16 22:16 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2013-07-16 22:07 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29624.1373475702@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®