From: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, jk@ozlabs.org,
alistair@popple.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsi: occ: Fetch OCC response header again to avoid checksum failure
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:00:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29dec8e0-a551-8aa0-4dd4-ae4d7efc37ca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220105202313.27510-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/5/22 14:23, Eddie James wrote:
> In the event that the driver state is reset, and the previous OCC
> operation had a sequence number of 1, there is the possibility that
> the SRAM buffer is updated in between fetching the OCC response header
> and the rest of the data (since the sequence number match is really a
> false positive). This results in a checksum failure. To avoid this
> condition, simply fetch the whole response rather than skipping the
> header when fetching the rest of the response.
This can be abandoned in favor of the latest patch, "Improve response
status checking"
Thanks,
Eddie
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> index 7eaab1be0aa4..660c3fc43be5 100644
> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> @@ -546,10 +546,15 @@ int fsi_occ_submit(struct device *dev, const void *request, size_t req_len,
> dev_dbg(dev, "resp_status=%02x resp_data_len=%d\n",
> resp->return_status, resp_data_length);
>
> - /* Grab the rest */
> + /*
> + * Grab the rest, including the occ response header again, just in case
> + * it changed in between our two getsram operations (this can happen
> + * despite the sequence number check if the driver state is reset). The
> + * data length shouldn't change at OCC runtime, and the response
> + * status, which may have changed, has to be checked by users anyway.
> + */
> if (resp_data_length > 1) {
> - /* already got 3 bytes resp, also need 2 bytes checksum */
> - rc = occ_getsram(occ, 8, &resp->data[3], resp_data_length - 1);
> + rc = occ_getsram(occ, 0, resp, resp_data_length + 7);
> if (rc)
> goto done;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-10 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-05 20:23 Eddie James
2022-01-10 16:00 ` Eddie James [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29dec8e0-a551-8aa0-4dd4-ae4d7efc37ca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome