From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-15.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DA5379C4A for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 15:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787239962; cv=none; b=diIKeec9Eqgrhcn7E+a4dyUxY4o8/7nzvRdqEYaTpnhpkT5O4dBKpPq8dE0TSkDgvVbOZuulV/KcpT2rSR2KqWwOdTF5qeNPufIqcmFMHZr02pobN90fzj+yNYlLyeqC3niRxwiFZ/6B4xXbnfO8hwSbT2dSz9CGFt0Ogyr+FvE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787239962; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g6P+i/6SPs0XGOpJWYj66gKutqHe5t9mTwQfRYkSxFE=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b8Xmd70OSoXCp4DYcC2PvHTCFbEwVleaVF7j+mgB5CTbbxY+XZNaQrJwhtf2YJWw0C6hGiAvhdcnBUqgfwVPHu8RTce5vG+f0L+PrBzWq/WDt1lkI3kVmqyWAyEIM5Aqdoldpdf94Zu6M8oJrzgq9a7mE3UAMc4onUD1o21s/AI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=WJDG6OAW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="WJDG6OAW" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=g6P+i/6SPs0XGOpJWYj66gKutqHe5t9mTwQfRYkSxFE=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1787239958; v=1; x=1787844758; b=WJDG6OAWDXkkKAJNn0oBSMMOSQyRIbqhJscZbZjXO0VxnkTZk7OuUkBC7Ge7Umq1aIY45QMl NIte+CKXuhevL78+YXf5ZJCI/+ALSmrNWvArVh9+Dhq2ii9rpnaFCzMYp54eedNsk0PGOP/CBP7 MBwqHVo8M+0N6bmCFqPg94HA= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from ehlo.thunderbird.net (2a06:63c5:9b00:3900:e1b3:d7a6:6110:4f65) by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 465dd9c2cf1b79c7; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 15:32:38 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 465dd9c2cf1b79c7 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:32:36 +0200 From: Luka Gejak To: Peter Robinson CC: Ping-Ke Shih , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Straube , Bitterblue Smith , Hans de Goede , luka.gejak@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] wifi: rtw88: preparations for RTL8723B/RTL8723BS User-Agent: Thunderbird for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20260814105327.6687-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev> <6C350314-0529-445E-9324-FD5C21C5B495@linux.dev> Message-ID: <2C57286A-F86B-4E47-B9A5-E9B762C25674@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On August 20, 2026 5:11:31 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Robinson wrote: >Hi Luka, > >> >> v7 follows shortly=2E It is hardware tested: 60 idle pings at 0% los= s with >> >> power save on, bidirectional load with no stall, 19=2E6 Mbit/s up an= d 36=2E8 >> >> down, UDP at 0% loss, three scans, three reconnects and a clean log= =2E >> > >> >I had done some basic testing with v5, and had left a v6 to build >> >overnight=2E I'll grab this shortly and do a build with v7 and do some >> >testing=2EIt was generally looking stable on the Pine64+ board I was >> >using for testing=2E >> > >> >> Thanks a lot for testing=2E In my testing changes in v6 and v7 didn't i= mpact >> performance and v7 should be as stable if not more stable then v5 and v= 6=2E > >I've literally just booted v7 so it'll take a bit to test it more=2E > >In v5/v6 I saw a bunch of these once it was running for a while, it >seems to be stable though=2E > >[ 5594=2E434616] rtw88_8723bs mmc0:0001:1: failed to get tx report from f= irmware >[ 5692=2E223363] rtw88_8723bs mmc0:0001:1: failed to get tx report from f= irmware >[ 5747=2E389804] rtw88_8723bs mmc0:0001:1: failed to get tx report from f= irmware >[ 5767=2E421101] rtw88_8723bs mmc0:0001:1: failed to get tx report from f= irmware > I think these are generic rtw88, not introduced by this driver, but I will investigate it either way=2E >Testing on iperf3 I'm getting just over 2Mbits/sec both TX/RX overall=2E > Hmm, this seems low, are those speeds on staging driver too, as in my testing they are around 30-40 down and ~20 up=2E >> >I think I may also have a device(s) with a 8723cs and/or a 8723ds I >> >can possibly test with, I'll see if I can remember/find it over the >> >weekend and get it running for some testing of that too=2E >> >> That would be nice, so we can see if other chips are affected, as Ping-= Ke >> said=2E > >I'll try and work out what I have over the weekend and will do some >testing against v7 on both devices=2E Thanks again=2E > >Peter Best regards, Luka Gejak