From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Alex Lu <alex_lu@realsil.com.cn>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Chou <max.chou@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix the vulnerable issue on enc key size
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 08:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2E345B0D-5412-4DC1-9E22-452939DD7D2B@holtmann.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200918110223.GA10235@laptop-alex>
Hi Alex,
> When someone attacks the service provider, it creates connection,
> authenticates. Then it requests key size of one byte and it identifies
> the key with brute force methods.
>
> After l2cap info req/resp exchange is complete. the attacker sends l2cap
> connect with specific PSM.
>
> In above procedure, there is no chance for the service provider to check
> the encryption key size before l2cap_connect(). Because the state of
> l2cap chan in conn->chan_l is BT_LISTEN, there is no l2cap chan with the
> state of BT_CONNECT or BT_CONNECT2.
>
> So service provider should check the encryption key size in
> l2cap_connect()
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Lu <alex_lu@realsil.com.cn>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> index ade83e224567..63df961d402d 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> @@ -4150,6 +4150,13 @@ static struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_connect(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
>
> if (conn->info_state & L2CAP_INFO_FEAT_MASK_REQ_DONE) {
> if (l2cap_chan_check_security(chan, false)) {
> + if (!l2cap_check_enc_key_size(conn->hcon)) {
> + l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN);
> + __set_chan_timer(chan, L2CAP_DISC_TIMEOUT);
> + result = L2CAP_CR_SEC_BLOCK;
> + status = L2CAP_CS_NO_INFO;
> + goto response;
> + }
> if (test_bit(FLAG_DEFER_SETUP, &chan->flags)) {
> l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2);
> result = L2CAP_CR_PEND;
I am not following what you are trying to fix here. Can you show this with a btmon trace from an attacking device?
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-20 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 11:02 Alex Lu
2020-09-20 6:09 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2020-09-21 6:08 陆朱伟
2020-09-25 17:33 ` Marcel Holtmann
2020-09-27 5:47 陆朱伟
2020-09-27 12:04 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2E345B0D-5412-4DC1-9E22-452939DD7D2B@holtmann.org \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=alex_lu@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.chou@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®