From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com (mail-pj1-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286AE48A2CD for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784808892; cv=none; b=V3H7aFrtCAnSxXr/EKviuFvA/Uos0JBiUK4fEqAtwGU0cUIB/SvF5nGHgm2kDdME7mnN1sBoRB8yWD/EymMfZDbuT2e7fICYaZyA8VOEZkR3u++gWKtexpvJtP4JBShFkhhNu8SrKAwEmZru0Ab+DOvGe5hiuUvNuDTiyjs03bo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784808892; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nQIK2qNRpQnnO3WE7Zx/GRD1UTj61auqsOK6uG/5LU4=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Message-Id:References:To; b=tYXAI44HgDQTnHpIZ9vbXNHmKMguo6YdKiCUyacvJ/LXgC2fD1KTeywzT7grlReRXNzLSbN9JKbfbGpGpTGVhRFT79qWKw78ZtR7Et8xnN3GObLvgE7N2vAJHA3rGg64L0j0cPMn9VTxm2+jXaVSt3DTHke6neyIIkIJ1owU1s4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=FjM3hoy2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FjM3hoy2" Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-384422b05b5so105736a91.2 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 05:14:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784808887; x=1785413687; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=rjYZGhFW3MVSYAcsvmcUSA6zBH26wWwBRnEVd1MS60I=; b=FjM3hoy2k4p4mZAw9M7NLPff83Vah/T7akDpI8PmPjT7taAtpfq+4oRmTARkjLgfS+ ormkGOYxiMCaoK3vPG9n+rtPVgbWpW5LyieXpLh9QIzxsL/ovWK9YiHjaGXkG+OrK0jr ijyePWisHc5AdxJePbvKbSHSa8bjGT+PkldMSVsutIuJ/cY0IPrVx8DA9on0Iu+ZrCV4 qhxBHmtJBUpL9kqR1au/Wy14h1s613YR32/eZlYi3BWZY85uxPzjkBOhzMf+rjf+4PwH BDSZ68VwOrug1QVSkKEuLoSFkc7xLT5FpO9O/YVLDitHbswhNYaE10dntx1mkcZcKach I/8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784808887; x=1785413687; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=rjYZGhFW3MVSYAcsvmcUSA6zBH26wWwBRnEVd1MS60I=; b=BWNDXJNM0jsJqk3ZCa39hk8e97IF5xwZcnPIIP7zFLU8/1DjLPelSeHdTn5FsobpWj wXoCjnuPP8N1m1gkq5530lksDfl14i8Aag3pF81NznSDNQK67MKS9th8lNxuHQCMm503 UDTUiMOdqJ9i75vFk0nlSy8/n/VFjY4fA3xeBHdE8yd5baq4u+juk2ZHoE8sPVyyLajO 4+1GtmCd+3a/sDr8w15COAt4MPPrS/JdkHd5eebctfzCr05mYBphrqGogF9N6QY/GhiA 9xTvUYw3CYNY8RWWxkQxQZ+GeFEfvoq1s1XZ63od5W+EhpXMRwq8anoCw1qzi9hqj4lW m/nQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RrUr/wsCH1exyrVQ20spp6WNjj81f5UBUsdbg+cKagqQ1vjFoj2CI9ZX+Bgv74wj8+Zk5t9xITtHxycg8g=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxYpsql1YB7WD2gDAX6L04dtp6CITq/LrIzFcQJJbtAmypL7E21 gXFYgI6M4ijVcQEak/HUzjkUshM90byKkPzpZy0buPQPLwpKdA9MPsv8 X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD11M0PCPyONZxUecKfUW1u3p+jq1pYSkohU5PzaJV6pnjA6bT/iGRE4b/xYFivd Wv+hPOk7/oOXsD5mGlHY5wbru2L6WsRz0WZ5cEspRWgcP6m0H5aTVk+sgUTI7dG0/S/EkD7yPbz uZ+sH7DMqg0rbp4vWWgnx6/MO5UQV5RHkpdfI8yd1FcuNnwzT9F1xk+D8I+xpzjopkDRGiaoT8l UQ/NWgzuFvtVpA3d6pu/42lmWR+Kfp2ieI/B66PrsAPNbAKmPF4QsdykZq1aXH9xk8o2hWjMNel RYaxK1pF36HiYvrY7FUBv/iZHsvRCOWu+Wzu3FpU3XxuAFV1xHBToWHj0BgnDB5G0c0vEW1WMvz DDa5oXa65qlxMmj8R9gKYIQxaOyqWQrQcm3prWRZPR+ty3lvH9H1+3diBDphFRaKEK8weX/5StH u3EXapm3K1jbHcuh0BRbv9e3aO X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:264c:b0:38e:6d16:1439 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38ec6624e75mr1992911a91.5.1784808887285; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 05:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([23.247.139.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-38ecab80f0asm916062a91.7.2026.07.23.05.14.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jul 2026 05:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81.1.8\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/7] mfd: ls2kbmc: Make a copy when parsing mode string From: Miao Wang In-Reply-To: <034E7CC0-47AA-40A3-BCB8-B9BEA2190DCA@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:14:28 +0800 Cc: Miao Wang via B4 Relay , Binbin Zhou , Chong Qiao , Huacai Chen , Corey Minyard , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Xi Ruoyao , WANG Xuerui , Yinbo Zhu , Jiaxun Yang , mfd@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2FF2A15C-6170-49A3-9E9F-F5CAAEC67AE4@gmail.com> References: <20260710-ls2kbmc-mod-v3-0-ef718636e78e@gmail.com> <20260710-ls2kbmc-mod-v3-1-ef718636e78e@gmail.com> <20260723112940.GC3363113@google.com> <034E7CC0-47AA-40A3-BCB8-B9BEA2190DCA@gmail.com> To: Lee Jones X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81.1.8) > 2026=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8823=E6=97=A5 20:02=EF=BC=8CMiao Wang = =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >=20 > Hi, >=20 >> 2026=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=8823=E6=97=A5 19:29=EF=BC=8CLee Jones = =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >>=20 >> Why is this v3 set still RFC? What comment are you requesting? >=20 > The reason why this is still in RFC is that I am still waiting > for response and discussion from Loongson personals on the > proposal that adding a DSDT entry for the ls2kbmc device that > describes the GPIO pin associated with the device to signal > the reset event of that BMC device. As pointed by Ruoyao, > such a proposal will need to be discussed with Loongson. I have > CC-ed the patch to the relevant maintainers from Loongson but > failed to receive any response. >=20 > Moreover, I am also in need of comments on the backup method > of searching the GPIO device and pin when such a DSDT entry > is not available. >=20 To complement, the part that I'm in need of comments is the 7-th patch of this series. The first 6 patches are focusing on fixing the existing issues in this driver. I thought that they could be managed to be applied altogether so that the driver would become a good, ready-to-use state. If the first 6 patches are good to be applied and we still receive no response from Loongson personnels, can I split the series into 2 parts? Cheers, Miao Wang