From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, sboyd@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devcoredump : Serialize devcd_del work
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:41:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a14c4f64ff3e029a76c85d064146e6c303c96bb.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1650364077-22694-1-git-send-email-quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 15:57 +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> In following scenario(diagram), when one thread X running dev_coredumpm() adds devcd
> device to the framework which sends uevent notification to userspace
> and another thread Y reads this uevent and call to devcd_data_write()
> which eventually try to delete the queued timer that is not initialized/queued yet.
>
> So, debug object reports some warning and in the meantime, timer is initialized
> and queued from X path. and from Y path, it gets reinitialized again and
> timer->entry.pprev=NULL and try_to_grab_pending() stucks.
>
> To fix this, introduce mutex to serialize the behaviour.
>
> cpu0(X) cpu1(Y)
>
> dev_coredump() uevent sent to userspace
> device_add() =========================> userspace process Y reads the uevents
> writes to devcd fd which
> results into writes to
>
> devcd_data_write()
> mod_delayed_work()
> try_to_grab_pending()
> del_timer()
> debug_assert_init()
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK
> schedule_delayed_work
>
Wouldn't it be easier to simply schedule this before adding it to sysfs
and sending the uevent?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 10:27 Mukesh Ojha
2022-04-22 10:03 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-04-22 12:13 ` Greg KH
2022-04-22 13:55 ` Greg KH
2022-04-22 13:41 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2022-04-22 13:53 ` Johannes Berg
2022-04-22 15:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-25 13:17 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-05-02 15:34 Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a14c4f64ff3e029a76c85d064146e6c303c96bb.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®