From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not leak kernel stack data in the KVM_S390_INTERRUPT ioctl
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:47:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a1b5ace-5077-3c3c-ec66-00f8f207701f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5632e756-ee92-ad8a-8c7c-efc5ee011f52@redhat.com>
On 13.09.19 09:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13/09/2019 09.37, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 13.09.19 09:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 13/09/2019 09.20, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:23:38 +0200
>>>> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, we already talked about deprecating support for pre-3.15 kernel
>>>>> stuff in the past (see
>>>>> https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/2.12#Future_incompatible_changes for
>>>>> example),
>>>>
>>>> Btw: did we ever do that? I don't quite recall what code we were
>>>> talking about...
>>>
>>> We never really did - but we also never fixed the issue: If you run the
>>> current QEMU on a kernel before 3.15, it refuses to work due to the
>>> missing in-kernel FLIC device:
>>>
>>> Initialization of device s390-flic-kvm failed: KVM is missing capability
>>> KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTR
>>>
>>> Since nobody really complained so far that running QEMU with KVM is
>>> still required on a kernel < 3.15, I think we could make this also
>>> "official" now and improve the error message a little bit, pointing the
>>> user to a kernel >= 3.15.
>>
>> Didn't we discuss back then to clean up *QEMU* and not the *kernel*?
>> Especially, to wait with cleanups until somebody requests to fix
>> instead. I mean you could have any user space in the wild that still
>> makes use of these interfaces ...
>
> Yes, that error message is part of QEMU, so I was referring to that one.
> Sorry for mixing this into a mail thread on the kernel mailing list :-/
Ah okay, I messed up then :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-13 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 9:00 Thomas Huth
2019-09-12 9:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-12 9:20 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-12 9:28 ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-12 10:52 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-12 11:23 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-13 7:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-09-13 7:34 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-13 7:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-13 7:43 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-13 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-09-12 10:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-12 11:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-12 10:47 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-12 11:08 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a1b5ace-5077-3c3c-ec66-00f8f207701f@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®