From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F52B231C91; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 18:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767119907; cv=none; b=shXPpFwXpIpEgGILMBJm8txOHL8PIKlUkPpjYf428JGGzb+ZXmajLpAgOz7f6AQ/IdAqDs6cY6nIKuAEW7H1zuxaPltZLZiHNQr4wXTIkfZFNmyeAtzZlClE+gZP/znXmAKPK6nnyUFgbsS1Ex9cauOQ2ctYSPZMZKcHm8871fg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767119907; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ur0VxoSB6RSnbWIDeXbhT/wa344vQ+T9KG6s/RtqtA0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QkE7jiBlP5wVlhJPPeGel8h1bH9SaR7EJ9yKti/xNdjSX8zts8eo/JWBZDxgsJ738jEXWhVIOwt+WN+ZLk4UMARN5X7A3e5HsS35jm7svqt/nSPgnxxey7RcOrts05AZE5iGxF/TIHK+KdnlJklo5+UHb2E7Y8WXAQdQCjVvXpU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=UbVCgevF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="UbVCgevF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=BJpNxtvmPujJMM+4H3jPm4H3rGg/lb3Bx3fF2YOrtP4=; b=UbVCgevF8yVFgZDPjydYWIEjYj jZu2gH3FsDZs61hGHOcTjjVCoH6RMONxEAFWbhb6iGGrxX1sVkzb3P/UtT9YAE4HOFs8erT+kAIyS +S0f4GS2ZL4cyiR2mbCkxSsVAE1kywJnr/NDntN5RXQDxBxP2Ie4mL9pwIsAlL2O/E0U=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vaebZ-000tMn-59; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 19:38:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 19:38:01 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Yohei Kojima Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Breno Leitao , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/5] net: netdevsim: fix inconsistent carrier state after link/unlink Message-ID: <2a1e3bdf-e6b0-4c6f-ac59-cda5ec565b82@lunn.ch> References: <1c8edd12-0933-4aae-8af3-307b133dce27@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > Sure, I've submitted the v2 patch here. > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1767108538.git.yk@y-koj.net/ > > Following your suggestion, I've removed the unrelated TFO tests and > the netdevsim test improvement. I will post the removed patches as a > separate series once net-next reopens. > > However, I kept the regression test for this patch in the v2 series, as > the "1.5.10. Co-posting selftests" section in the maintainer-netdev > document says: Thanks for doing this. I don't know enough about netdevsim to be able to do a proper review, so i will let somebody else do that. Andrew