From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Ilia Gavrilov <Ilia.Gavrilov@infotecs.ru>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"lvc-project@linuxtesting.org" <lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [lvc-project] [PATCH net v2] xsk: Fix overflow in descriptor validation
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:25:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a261520-1d86-43d6-af56-7c5f9366c76b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e946bb9-2629-485e-ae89-5aa8c4930a4d@infotecs.ru>
From: Ilia Gavrilov <Ilia.Gavrilov@infotecs.ru>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:12:20 +0000
> On 10/7/25 17:06, Ilia Gavrilov wrote:
>> The desc->len value can be set up to U32_MAX. If umem tx_metadata_len
>> option is also set, the value of the expression
>> 'desc->len + pool->tx_metadata_len' can overflow and validation
>> of the incorrect descriptor will be successfully passed.
>> This can lead to a subsequent chain of arithmetic overflows
>> in the xsk_build_skb() function and incorrect sk_buff allocation.
>>
>> To reproduce the overflow, this piece of userspace code can be used:
>> struct xdp_umem_reg umem_reg;
>> umem_reg.addr = (__u64)(void *)umem;
>> ...
>> umem_reg.chunk_size = 4096;
>> umem_reg.tx_metadata_len = 16;
>> umem_reg.flags = XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN;
>> setsockopt(sfd, SOL_XDP, XDP_UMEM_REG, &umem_reg, sizeof(umem_reg));
>> ...
>>
>> xsk_ring_prod__reserve(tq, batch_size, &idx);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < nr_packets; ++i) {
>> struct xdp_desc *tx_desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(tq, idx + i);
>> tx_desc->addr = packets[i].addr;
>> tx_desc->addr += umem->tx_metadata_len;
>> tx_desc->options = XDP_TX_METADATA;
>> tx_desc->len = UINT32_MAX;
>> }
>>
>> xsk_ring_prod__submit(tq, nr_packets);
>> ...
>> sendto(sfd, NULL, 0, MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, 0);
>>
>> Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
>> (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
>> Fixes: 341ac980eab9 ("xsk: Support tx_metadata_len")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Ilia Gavrilov <Ilia.Gavrilov@infotecs.ru>
>> ---
>> v2: Add a repro
>> net/xdp/xsk_queue.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
>> index f16f390370dc..b206a8839b39 100644
>> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
>> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_queue.h
>> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static inline bool xp_aligned_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>> struct xdp_desc *desc)
>> {
>> u64 addr = desc->addr - pool->tx_metadata_len;
>> - u64 len = desc->len + pool->tx_metadata_len;
>> + u64 len = (u64)desc->len + pool->tx_metadata_len;
>> u64 offset = addr & (pool->chunk_size - 1);
>>
>> if (!desc->len)
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static inline bool xp_unaligned_validate_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>> struct xdp_desc *desc)
>> {
>> u64 addr = xp_unaligned_add_offset_to_addr(desc->addr) - pool->tx_metadata_len;
>> - u64 len = desc->len + pool->tx_metadata_len;
>> + u64 len = (u64)desc->len + pool->tx_metadata_len;
>>
>> if (!desc->len)
>> return false;
>
> Hi, Alexander, Magnus!
>
> I'm sorry to bother you.
> Will this patch be applied or rejected?
Hey,
We took a different solution: [0]
[0]
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=07ca98f906a403637fc5e513a872a50ef1247f3b
Thanks,
Olek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-07 14:06 Ilia Gavrilov
2025-10-15 8:12 ` [lvc-project] " Ilia Gavrilov
2025-10-15 10:25 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a261520-1d86-43d6-af56-7c5f9366c76b@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=Ilia.Gavrilov@infotecs.ru \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®