Re: [PATCH net-next][resend v1 1/1] netlink: Don't use int as bool in netlink_update_socket_mc()

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 2023-07-11 at 09:33 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 01:06:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The bit operations take boolean parameter and return also boolean
> > (in test_bit()-like cases). Don't threat booleans as integers when
> > it's not needed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > index 383631873748..d81e7a43944c 100644
> > --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > @@ -1623,9 +1623,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_set_err);
> >  /* must be called with netlink table grabbed */
> >  static void netlink_update_socket_mc(struct netlink_sock *nlk,
> >  				     unsigned int group,
> > -				     int is_new)
> > +				     bool new)
> >  {
> > -	int old, new = !!is_new, subscriptions;
> > +	int subscriptions;
> > +	bool old;
> >  
> >  	old = test_bit(group - 1, nlk->groups);
> >  	subscriptions = nlk->subscriptions - old + new;
> 
> So what is the outcome of "int - bool + bool" in the line above?

FTR, I agree with Leon, the old code is more readable to me/I don't see
a practical gain with this change.

Cheers,

Paolo