From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: drop bogus "cc" clobber from __try_cmpxchg_user_asm()
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:16:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a34e60a-6ac3-0f83-51d5-80a4c6403504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485c0c0b-a3a7-0b7c-5264-7d00c01de032@suse.com>
On 6/7/22 17:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> As noted (and fixed) a couple of times in the past, "=@cc<cond>" outputs
> and clobbering of "cc" don't work well together. The compiler appears to
> mean to reject such, but doesn't - in its upstream form - quite manage
> to yet for "cc". Furthermore two similar macros don't clobber "cc", and
> clobbering "cc" is pointless in asm()-s for x86 anyway - the compiler
> always assumes status flags to be clobbered there.
>
> Fixes: 989b5db215a2 ("x86/uaccess: Implement macros for CMPXCHG on user addresses")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> ---
> The change I continue to carry locally actually allows specifying that
> "cc" is _not_ clobbered; it only happens to improve detection of bad
> situations like the one here.
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ do { \
> [ptr] "+m" (*_ptr), \
> [old] "+a" (__old) \
> : [new] ltype (__new) \
> - : "memory", "cc"); \
> + : "memory"); \
> if (unlikely(__err)) \
> goto label; \
> if (unlikely(!success)) \
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-07 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-07 15:00 Jan Beulich
2022-06-07 15:16 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a34e60a-6ac3-0f83-51d5-80a4c6403504@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®