From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Zhiguo Niu <niuzhiguo84@gmail.com>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ke.wang@unisoc.com,
Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com, baocong.liu@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: compress: fix UAF of f2fs_inode_info in f2fs_free_dic
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:31:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a387dd6-9c10-478d-aae2-8284ad395944@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHJ8P3+ygYG=9ZnPY15=L9AwGr9b5_2PkMwT8AXOyE68v6Hg3A@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/5/25 10:44, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
> Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> 于2025年6月5日周四 10:23写道:
>>
>> On 6/4/25 19:37, Zhiguo Niu wrote:
>>> The decompress_io_ctx may be released asynchronously after
>>> I/O completion. If this file is deleted immediately after read,
>>> and the kworker of processing post_read_wq has not been executed yet
>>> due to high workloads, It is possible that the inode(f2fs_inode_info)
>>> is evicted and freed before it is used f2fs_free_dic.
>>>
>>> The UAF case as below:
>>> Thread A Thread B
>>> - f2fs_decompress_end_io
>>> - f2fs_put_dic
>>> - queue_work
>>> add free_dic work to post_read_wq
>>> - do_unlink
>>> - iput
>>> - evict
>>> - call_rcu
>>> This file is deleted after read.
>>>
>>> Thread C kworker to process post_read_wq
>>> - rcu_do_batch
>>> - f2fs_free_inode
>>> - kmem_cache_free
>>> inode is freed by rcu
>>> - process_scheduled_works
>>> - f2fs_late_free_dic
>>> - f2fs_free_dic
>>> - f2fs_release_decomp_mem
>>> read (dic->inode)->i_compress_algorithm
>>>
>>> This patch use __iget before f2fs_free_dic and iput after free the dic.
>>>
>>> Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
>>> Fixes: bff139b49d9f ("f2fs: handle decompress only post processing in softirq")
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Baocong Liu <baocong.liu@unisoc.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2: use __iget/iput function
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/compress.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
>>> index b3c1df9..3f0c18d 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
>>> @@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ static void f2fs_release_decomp_mem(struct decompress_io_ctx *dic,
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void f2fs_free_dic(struct decompress_io_ctx *dic,
>>> - bool bypass_destroy_callback);
>>> + bool bypass_destroy_callback, bool late_free);
>>>
>>> struct decompress_io_ctx *f2fs_alloc_dic(struct compress_ctx *cc)
>>> {
>>> @@ -1743,12 +1743,12 @@ struct decompress_io_ctx *f2fs_alloc_dic(struct compress_ctx *cc)
>>> return dic;
>>>
>>> out_free:
>>> - f2fs_free_dic(dic, true);
>>> + f2fs_free_dic(dic, true, false);
>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void f2fs_free_dic(struct decompress_io_ctx *dic,
>>> - bool bypass_destroy_callback)
>>> + bool bypass_destroy_callback, bool late_free)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> @@ -1775,6 +1775,8 @@ static void f2fs_free_dic(struct decompress_io_ctx *dic,
>>> }
>>>
>>> page_array_free(dic->inode, dic->rpages, dic->nr_rpages);
>>> + if (late_free)
>>> + iput(dic->inode);
>>> kmem_cache_free(dic_entry_slab, dic);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1783,16 +1785,20 @@ static void f2fs_late_free_dic(struct work_struct *work)
>>> struct decompress_io_ctx *dic =
>>> container_of(work, struct decompress_io_ctx, free_work);
>>>
>>> - f2fs_free_dic(dic, false);
>>> + f2fs_free_dic(dic, false, true);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void f2fs_put_dic(struct decompress_io_ctx *dic, bool in_task)
>>> {
>>> if (refcount_dec_and_test(&dic->refcnt)) {
>>> if (in_task) {
>>> - f2fs_free_dic(dic, false);
>>> + f2fs_free_dic(dic, false, false);
>>> } else {
>>> INIT_WORK(&dic->free_work, f2fs_late_free_dic);
>>> + /* to avoid inode is evicted simultaneously */
>>> + spin_lock(&dic->inode->i_lock);
>>> + __iget(dic->inode);
>>> + spin_unlock(&dic->inode->i_lock);
>>
>> Oh, how about using igrab() instead?
> Hi Chao,
> after I check igrab, I think it is ok,
> but here We don't need care about igarb's return value, right?
I guess "return NULL" should be impossible case, but still we can add
f2fs_bug_on() to detect any potential bug, right?
Thanks,
> Thanks!
>
>>
>>> queue_work(F2FS_I_SB(dic->inode)->post_read_wq,
>>> &dic->free_work);
>>> }
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 11:37 Zhiguo Niu
2025-06-05 2:23 ` Chao Yu
2025-06-05 2:44 ` Zhiguo Niu
2025-06-05 3:31 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2025-06-05 4:05 ` Zhiguo Niu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a387dd6-9c10-478d-aae2-8284ad395944@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=Hao_hao.Wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=baocong.liu@unisoc.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=ke.wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niuzhiguo84@gmail.com \
--cc=zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®