Re: [PATCH] block: paride: on26: Replace mdelay with msleep in on26_test_port

[Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>]

On 2018/1/27 1:31, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:42:25PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> After checking all possible call chains to on26_test_port() here,
>> my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context,
>> namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
>> And on26_test_port() is only called by pi_probe_unit() that calls
>> wait_event() through pi_claim(),
>> so it indicates that on26_test_port() can call functions that can sleep.
>> Thus mdelay can be replaced with msleep to avoid busy wait.
> Sigh...  Here's how I would've written it:
>
> "
> on26_test_port() is never called from atomic contexts.
>
> It has no direct callers and it is reachable only via ->test_port.
> ->test_port has only one user:
> drivers/block/paride/paride.c:322:              max = pi->proto->test_port(pi);
> in pi_probe_unit().  That gets called only from pi_init(), called from
> p{d,cd,f,t,g}_detect(), called from module_init stuff, all of the above
> without entering atomic contexts along the way.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic contexts, on26_test_port() contains
> mdelay(100), i.e. busy-loops for 0.1s; that's neither nice nor needed, since
> msleep() would serve just as well.
>
> Found by [reference to tool]"

Okay, thanks for your patient guidance :)
I will revise the description and send v2 patch, and follow the advice 
in my next patches.


Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai