From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B911BF2F; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 06:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=134.134.136.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707287182; cv=none; b=S8ke533lZYxxBpczpYcV1U05YUPYp5Bc7s/WBu4Wis8UX3NwRXHzi+3sy/aaUyTYt1nXb2jwKLMLjD1iLfbfqbm6qcshZOsJmYyLvQ+IzRFoV7NfjSx5mvxaEHzVeH+VOwQUJYcXyH9qmv8+lGHoGmDc/s72LCCp5nhZNt6uqX8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707287182; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JR4iOw+Y89uOOayhfwGLM6PMQqlJE72PkLkGScVGlEY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Hy2IFo0Xl2atrSbs1+6iV0CF5SvDW8NcY08VEQBbvaIeuitlEeH7xPNLAjbgJsm+feoXdplV5rMk46T0hrZe3lpi4fg0sHTwvCcnoUJvEoHeDEioRF79Kz0C1eNo0NUjO8OJv8+dGuH8QR1dGcrFGhGfOZ/mvWRvtC8ZVZtEZHc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=j2TcFVBd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=134.134.136.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="j2TcFVBd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707287179; x=1738823179; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JR4iOw+Y89uOOayhfwGLM6PMQqlJE72PkLkGScVGlEY=; b=j2TcFVBd7v6A6aj7waG2BYmDBkADYOynAss1utJVNrpS8iGVrAYCsTWx nbgRxCIVM1cpHCaAMDWpn5ODTrIDWbAVAzj9QB54zGRF2vM3L8GvB+6hi UZ0uI4hGosLxZQsE4EZa9MdJpA2dOWS1nW6c8k4pEjLvI6dcwhCKw+Nns NmbPNPliIk5iTbNQlkiLDhA9i4ceIbDyEiLQEZKGK1gwotMuduAaJkqpE s2Q5G9rpOpGXncEEFb3t3GLzJDa1nrhsn19YyDxNagP0t5rlQIB+EW9NB tyYR7CBAtHNI2cBnMWvFqkhXPGXmLLpOJKW8q7D6qHNRuiHnicXYrZ0Fu g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10976"; a="395336114" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,250,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="395336114" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Feb 2024 22:26:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,250,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="1268658" Received: from xiaoyaol-hp-g830.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.93.22.149]) ([10.93.22.149]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Feb 2024 22:26:15 -0800 Message-ID: <2a5c652f-6e14-4ed7-accd-1cc49f099701@intel.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 14:26:12 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/asyncpf: Fixes the size of asyncpf PV data and related docs Content-Language: en-US To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20231025055914.1201792-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> <170724645418.390975.5795716772259959043.b4-ty@google.com> From: Xiaoyao Li In-Reply-To: <170724645418.390975.5795716772259959043.b4-ty@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/7/2024 5:36 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 01:59:12 -0400, Xiaoyao Li wrote: >> First patch tries to make the size of 'struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data' >> matched with its documentation. >> >> Second patch fixes the wrong description of the MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN >> documentation and some minor improvement. >> >> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZS7ERnnRqs8Fl0ZF@google.com/T/#m0e12562199923ab58975d4ae9abaeb4a57597893 >> >> [...] > > Applied to kvm-x86 asyncpf_abi. I'll send a pull request (for 6.9) to Paolo > "soon" to ensure we get his eyeballs on the ABI change. Thanks! > [1/2] x86/kvm/async_pf: Use separate percpu variable to track the enabling of asyncpf > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/ccb2280ec2f9 > [2/2] KVM: x86: Improve documentation of MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/df01f0a1165c > > -- > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next