Re: [PATCH 1/5] wifi: wilc1000: set preamble size to auto as default in wilc_init_fw_config()

[<Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com>]

Hi Alexis,

On 1/19/24 00:43, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 1/18/24 17:52, Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 1/18/24 08:08, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> "WILC driver currently applies some default configuration whenever the firmware
>>> is initialized, and sets the default preamble size to short. However, despite
>>> this passed option, firmware is also able to successfully connect to access
>>> points only using long preamble, so this setting does not really enforce short
>>> preambles and is misleading regarding applied configuration.
>>>
>>> Update default configuration and make it match the firmware behavior by passing
>>> the existing WILC_FW_PREAMBLE_AUTO value (2 instead of 0). The updated setting
>>> does not really alter firmware behavior since it is still capable to connect to
>>> both short preamble and long preamble access points, but at list the setting now
>>> expresses for real the corresponding firmware behavior"
>>>
>>> To give a bit of context around this one: I do not have access to the firmware
>>> internals, I just took the patch from Ajay and I merely did some tests around it
>>> with multiple APs (basically, making a WILC STA connect and ping the AP), and
>>> ensured with wireshark to get at least one AP be really "locked" with long
>>> preamble, with WILC managing to connect to it.
>>>
>>
>> Here are some more details about this change. It have been implemented
>> to address the transmission(Tx) blackout issue observed in the 802.11b
>> mode. The modification has no impact on the other modes, which will
>> continue to work as they did in the previous implementation. This change
>> will allow the 802.11b transmission(2, 5.5, 11Mbps) to use long preamble.
> 
> Ah, so it fixes a specific bug (and makes parts of my suggested description
> wrong). Has there been any report about this "TX blackout issue" on the mailing
> lists ? If so, we could enrich the message with some details from the report and
> add some missing Reported-By/Fixes/Closes tags.
> 

For this issue, there are no details on the mailing lists. It was
discovered by internal QA team.

Regards,
Ajay