From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: HOYOUNG SEO <hy50.seo@samsung.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mkp@kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
stanleyjhu@google.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
kwangwon.min@samsung.com, kwmad.kim@samsung.com,
cpgs@samsung.com, h10.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Limit early link recovery in the error handler to runtime PM
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:57:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ac84978-3223-44b7-af80-de59def8a0f1@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66ffa35908823d693cde364ef6fbdeef50aa5a69.1793943246.git.hy50.seo@samsung.com>
On 11/5/26 10:11 PM, HOYOUNG SEO wrote:
> ufshcd_rpm_get_noresume(hba);
> - if (hba->pm_op_in_progress) {
> + if (READ_ONCE(hba->runtime_pm_in_progress)) {
> ufshcd_link_recovery(hba);
> ufshcd_rpm_put(hba);
> return;
Has it been considered to use the runtime PM status maintained by the
PM core instead of introducing a new member variable? While
ufshcd_wl_runtime_suspend() or ufshcd_wl_runtime_resume() is running,
hba->ufs_device_wlun->sdev_gendev.power.runtime_status is either
RPM_SUSPENDING or RPM_RESUMING. During system PM it is either
RPM_ACTIVE or RPM_SUSPENDED. Reading runtime_status without holding
power.lock is not more racy than reading the new flag.
Thanks,
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20261106061544epcas2p4b1ebab9e2c0e041ee52ff724caf8a9e8@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2026-11-06 6:11 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] scsi: ufs: core: Avoid redundant link recovery from the error handler during PM HOYOUNG SEO
[not found] ` <CGME20261106061545epcas2p2e16985621e8852e675e5a557857dca54@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2026-11-06 6:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Clear saved errors in ufshcd_link_recovery() HOYOUNG SEO
[not found] ` <CGME20261106061546epcas2p3b0d54ffe9fcea407f7d0e27ed579de0d@epcas2p3.samsung.com>
2026-11-06 6:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Hold host_sem in ufshcd_wl_poweroff() HOYOUNG SEO
2026-11-06 21:56 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <CGME20261106061547epcas2p40541421c139d758cdc3633302634d29b@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2026-11-06 6:11 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Limit early link recovery in the error handler to runtime PM HOYOUNG SEO
2026-11-06 21:57 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ac84978-3223-44b7-af80-de59def8a0f1@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=h10.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=hy50.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=kwangwon.min@samsung.com \
--cc=kwmad.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=stanleyjhu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®