From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752887AbdHTJTS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 20 Aug 2017 05:19:18 -0400
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:4513 "EHLO
        szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752687AbdHTJTR (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 20 Aug 2017 05:19:17 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 net-next 00/22] Huawei HiNIC Ethernet Driver
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <bc.y@huawei.com>, <victor.gissin@huawei.com>, <zhaochen6@huawei.com>,
        <tony.qu@huawei.com>
References: <cover.1502996306.git.aviad.krawczyk@huawei.com>
 <20170817.123314.47126554742044813.davem@davemloft.net>
From: Aviad Krawczyk <aviad.krawczyk@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <2ad01286-b4c2-569a-3a4d-9a632286d2c7@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 12:18:45 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170817.123314.47126554742044813.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.206.50.78]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
        refid=str=0001.0A020206.59995411.00EF,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
        ip=0.0.0.0,
        so=2014-11-16 11:51:01,
        dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 5cf08eb4d9b3b44336f894d3471d1fa3
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Got it

On 8/17/2017 10:33 PM, David Miller wrote:
> 
> You've posted this series 3 times today.
> 
> That's way too fast.
> 
> You must wait at least one full day for more feedback to come
> your way.
> 
> If you just repsin your series for every little small change nobody is
> going to perform a thorough review of your patches because you keep
> respining them so often that people feel like their review efforts are
> going to be wasted.
> 
> You must be patient.  I can see that the reason you are respinning so
> often if because you want your patches integrated more quickly.
> 
> But what you are doing is having the opposite effect.  It is draining
> on people and will make your changes take longer to be integrated.
> 
> .
>