From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 12:43:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2af931a4-00ec-4e72-8f3e-058d71b04d84@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb57601d-abac-492a-8e62-dc1c406af572@arm.com>
On 21/05/25 7:44 pm, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 19/05/2025 08:48, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Override the generic definition to use get_and_clear_full_ptes(). This helper
>> does a TLBI only for the starting and ending contpte block of the range, whereas
>> the current implementation will call ptep_get_and_clear() for every contpte block,
>> thus doing a TLBI on every contpte block. Therefore, we have a performance win.
>> The arm64 definition of pte_accessible() allows us to batch around it in clear_flush_ptes():
>> #define pte_accessible(mm, pte) \
>> (mm_tlb_flush_pending(mm) ? pte_present(pte) : pte_valid(pte))
>>
>> All ptes are obviously present in the folio batch, and they are also valid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> Please squash this with the
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 12 +++++++++---
>> include/linux/pgtable.h | 4 ++++
>> mm/pgtable-generic.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 2a77f11b78d5..8872ea5f0642 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -1553,6 +1553,11 @@ extern void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>> pte_t old_pte, pte_t new_pte);
>>
>> +#define modify_prot_start_ptes modify_prot_start_ptes
>> +extern pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>> + unsigned int nr);
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index 8fcf59ba39db..fe60be8774f4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1523,7 +1523,8 @@ static int __init prevent_bootmem_remove_init(void)
>> early_initcall(prevent_bootmem_remove_init);
>> #endif
>>
>> -pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>> {
>> if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198)) {
>> /*
>> @@ -1532,9 +1533,14 @@ pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte
>> * in cases where cpu is affected with errata #2645198.
>> */
>> if (pte_user_exec(ptep_get(ptep)))
>> - return ptep_clear_flush(vma, addr, ptep);
>> + return clear_flush_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, nr);
>> }
>> - return ptep_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
>> + return get_and_clear_full_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, nr, 0);
>> +}
> I think we can do this more precisely with respect to tlbis and also without
> needing to create a new clear_flush_ptes() helper:
>
>
> pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
> {
> pte_t pte = get_and_clear_full_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, nr, 0);
>
> if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198)) {
> /*
> * Break-before-make (BBM) is required for all user space mappings
> * when the permission changes from executable to non-executable
> * in cases where cpu is affected with errata #2645198.
> */
> if (pte_accessible(vma->vm_mm, pte) && pte_user_exec(pte))
> __flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, nr * PAGE_SIZE,
> PAGE_SIZE, true, 3);
> }
>
> return pte;
> }
>
>
>> +
>> +pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + return modify_prot_start_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, 1);
>> }
>>
>> void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> index e40ed57e034d..41f4a8de5c28 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> @@ -828,6 +828,10 @@ extern pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> pte_t *ptep);
>> #endif
>>
>> +extern pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long address,
>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr);
>> +
>> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_HUGE_CLEAR_FLUSH
>> extern pmd_t pmdp_huge_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> unsigned long address,
>> diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>> index 5a882f2b10f9..e238f88c3cac 100644
>> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>> @@ -90,17 +90,23 @@ int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> -#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
>> -pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> - pte_t *ptep)
>> +pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>> {
>> struct mm_struct *mm = (vma)->vm_mm;
>> pte_t pte;
>> - pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, ptep);
>> + pte = get_and_clear_full_ptes(mm, address, ptep, nr, 0);
>> if (pte_accessible(mm, pte))
>> - flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
>> + flush_tlb_range(vma, address, address + nr * PAGE_SIZE);
>> return pte;
>> }
> Let's not create a new generic helper if only arm64 is using it. We would
> also want to add a doc header to describe this helper. My proposal avoids
> this.
This is better, thanks!
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>> +
>> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
>> +pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> + pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + return clear_flush_ptes(vma, address, ptep, 1);
>> +}
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-22 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-19 7:48 [PATCH v3 0/5] Optimize mprotect() for large folios Dev Jain
2025-05-19 7:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-05-21 8:43 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-21 11:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-22 5:45 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-21 12:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22 5:43 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-22 7:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22 7:47 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-22 16:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 10:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-04 11:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 7:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-05-21 11:16 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-21 11:45 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-22 6:33 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-22 7:51 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-22 6:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-16 6:37 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-19 7:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: Optimize mprotect() by PTE batching Dev Jain
2025-05-19 8:18 ` Barry Song
2025-05-20 9:18 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-21 13:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-22 6:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-22 7:11 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-16 11:24 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26 8:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-27 4:55 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-19 7:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start Dev Jain
2025-05-21 14:14 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-22 7:13 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-05-19 7:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit Dev Jain
2025-05-21 14:17 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-22 7:12 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2af931a4-00ec-4e72-8f3e-058d71b04d84@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®