mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
	Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: selftests: Move memslot_perf_test off the 256M ELF load address
Date: Mon,  5 Oct 2026 09:17:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2affbc2727a4fdae1d187dada40a26e0ab581c4a.1791014924.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1791014923.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>

KVM selftests are built with -fno-PIE/-no-pie so the binary uses fixed
load addresses.
On powerpc64, GNU ld default links at 0x10000000 (256M) which is also
the MEM_GPA, so the identity map trips with the error:
  PTE already present at level: 4 gva: 0x10000000 pte:0xc00000000002018f

Put the test slots at 512M instead which is past the ELF.
e.g. failure w/o this fix:

./memslot_perf_test -s 514
Random seed: 0x423558ef
Testing map performance with 1 runs, 5 seconds each

==== Test Assertion Failure ====
  lib/powerpc/processor.c:235: !pte
  pid=371 tid=371 errno=2 - No such file or directory
     1  0x0000000010018293: virt_arch_pg_map at processor.c:235
     2  0x0000000010008b3f: virt_pg_map at kvm_util.h:1325
     3   (inlined by) virt_map at kvm_util.c:1571
     4  0x0000000010001cab: prepare_vm at memslot_perf_test.c:353
     5   (inlined by) test_execute at memslot_perf_test.c:816
     6   (inlined by) test_loop at memslot_perf_test.c:1062
     7   (inlined by) main at memslot_perf_test.c:1136
     8  0x000000001001d713: __libc_start_call_main at libc-start.o:?
     9  0x000000001001db47: __libc_start_main_impl at ??:?
  PTE already present at level: 4 gva: 0x10000000 pte:0xc00000000002018f

Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm        | 1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index 6e672484a22f..a7ecd7a242a9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_powerpc += kvm_binary_stats_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_powerpc += kvm_page_table_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_powerpc += set_memory_region_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_powerpc += memslot_modification_stress_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_powerpc += memslot_perf_test
 
 SPLIT_TESTS += arch_timer
 SPLIT_TESTS += get-reg-list
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
index 844ea9b7bb41..2913a4de4cc9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 #define MEM_EXTRA_SIZE		SZ_64K
 
 #define MEM_SIZE		(SZ_512M + MEM_EXTRA_SIZE)
-#define MEM_GPA			SZ_256M
+#define MEM_GPA			SZ_512M
 #define MEM_AUX_GPA		MEM_GPA
 #define MEM_SYNC_GPA		MEM_AUX_GPA
 #define MEM_TEST_GPA		(MEM_AUX_GPA + MEM_EXTRA_SIZE)
-- 
2.39.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-05  3:47 [PATCH v6 0/5] KVM: selftests: add powerpc support Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-05  3:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: PPC: selftests: add support for powerpc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-05  3:47 ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM) [this message]
2026-10-05  3:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] KVM: PPC: selftests: Add helper for checking if running nested Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-05  3:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: PPC: selftests: Skip idle-page check when running nested on pseries LPAR Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-10-05  3:47 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: selftests: Don't limit LE dirty-bitmap bitops to s390x Ritesh Harjani (IBM)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2affbc2727a4fdae1d187dada40a26e0ab581c4a.1791014924.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®