From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ksz: add mdio-parent-bus property for internal MDIO
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:35:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b03f429-9ae2-4c7a-9cec-0bc2f3c6e816@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyDe_ObZ-laVk8c2@pengutronix.de>
> > I'm not saying whether this is good or bad, I'm just worried about
> > mixing quantities having different measurement units into the same
> > address space.
> >
> > Just like in the case of an mdio-mux, there is no address space isolation
> > between the parent bus and the child bus. AKA you can't have this,
> > because there would be clashes:
> >
> > host_bus: mdio@abcd {
> > ethernet-phy@2 {
> > reg = <2>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > child_bus: mdio@efgh {
> > mdio-parent-bus = <&host_bus>;
> >
> > ethernet-phy@2 {
> > reg = <2>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > But there is a big difference. With an mdio-mux, you could statically
> > detect address space clashes by inspecting the PHY addresses on the 2
> > buses. But with the lan937x child MDIO bus, in this design, you can't,
> > because the "reg" values don't represent MDIO addresses, but switch port
> > numbers (this is kind of important, but I don't see it mentioned in the
> > dt-binding).
>
> In current state, the driver still require properly configured addresses
> in the devicetree. So, it will be visible in the DT.
This is not what i was expecting, especially from mv88e6xxx
perspective. The older generation of devices had the PHYs available on
the 'host bus', as well as the 'child bus', using a 1:1 address
mapping. You could in theory even skip the 'child bus' and list the
PHYs on the 'host bus' and phy-handle would make it work. However i
see from a later comment that does not work here, you need some
configuration done over SPI, which mv88e6xx does not need.
>
> > These are translated by lan937x_create_phy_addr_map() using
> > the CASCADE_ID/VPHY_ADD pin strapping information read over SPI.
> > I.e. with the same device tree, you may or may not have address space
> > clashes depending on pin strapping. No way to tell.
>
> The PHY address to port mapping in the driver is needed to make the
> internal switch interrupt controller assign interrupts to proper PHYs.
You are talking about:
ds->user_mii_bus->irq[phy] = irq;
in ksz_irq_phy_setup.
I naively expect 'phy' to be the 'reg' value in DT, and the 'dev'
value which passed to mdiobus_read_nested(bus, dev, reg) ?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 11:07 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] Side MDIO Support for LAN937x Switches Oleksij Rempel
2024-10-29 11:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ksz: add internal MDIO bus description Oleksij Rempel
2024-10-29 11:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ksz: add mdio-parent-bus property for internal MDIO Oleksij Rempel
2024-10-29 12:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-10-29 13:11 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-10-29 20:35 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2024-10-30 5:37 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-10-30 12:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-10-29 11:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: dsa: microchip: Refactor MDIO handling for side MDIO access Oleksij Rempel
2024-10-29 11:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: dsa: microchip: cleanup error handling in ksz_mdio_register Oleksij Rempel
2024-10-29 11:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net: dsa: microchip: add support for side MDIO interface in LAN937x Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b03f429-9ae2-4c7a-9cec-0bc2f3c6e816@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®