Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] cpupower-frequency-info.1: use the proper name of the --perf option

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 3/24/26 17:06, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 3/24/26 16:39, Roberto Ricci wrote:
>> The cpupower-frequency-info(1) man page describes a '--perf' option.
>> Even though this form is accepted by the program, its proper name is
>> '--performance'.
>>
>> cpufreq-info.c:
>>     {"performance", no_argument,     NULL,     'c'},
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roberto Ricci <io@r-ricci.it>
>> ---
>>   tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1 | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1 b/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1
>> index 47fdd7218748..1173d4f31e69 100644
>> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1
>> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1
>> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ human\-readable output for the \-f, \-w, \-s and \-y parameters.
>>   \fB\-n\fR \fB\-\-no-rounding\fR
>>   Output frequencies and latencies without rounding off values.
>>   .TP
>> -\fB\-c\fR \fB\-\-perf\fR
>> +\fB\-c\fR \fB\-\-performance\fR
> 
> I would keep perf and also add performance since --perf and --performance
> work - it is lot easier to type --perf

You can send just this one patch unless there are dependencies with
others.

thanks,
-- Shuah