From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967366AbdADBjR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:39:17 -0500 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:47670 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967349AbdADBjH (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:39:07 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Use pdev for platform device and pci_dev for pci device To: Andy Shevchenko References: <1483454364-28650-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1483454364-28650-3-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20170103234047.GB13952@roeck-us.net> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <2b44637f-d9aa-c0a5-1532-421b474e35e4@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:38:58 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/03/2017 03:50 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:39:59AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>> Use pdev for struct platform_device, pcidev for struct pci_dev, and dev >>>>> for struct device variables to improve consistency. >>>>> >>>>> Remove 'struct platform_device *dev;' from struct iTCO_wdt_private since >>>>> it was unused. >>>> >>>> Would pci_dev work? >>>> >>> Sure, or maybe just 'pci'. Any preference ? >> >> Just slightly prefer pci_dev over others (pcidev, pci), but do not >> insist. Up to you. > > Or even > > struct device *dev; > ... > struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev); > 'dev' would have to be a pointer to the parent device. If I consider using dev_{info,err}, I'll need 'dev' in struct iTCO_wdt_private. I think I'll stick with pci_dev. Thanks, Guenter