From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB1C137906; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719233385; cv=none; b=UgAT+uoUEqF9+uNz1fGIIN4ax04AM6K5SPBnrfnwjwJxBiYbobhxb1FkVAus4C4Py3ZLj3nr9oqT0ysrVL+uPR263vVJ99rQI6es8ZeC2/lEyo9a1lR3hX9sEJIIU8GpDlQ+2Gif9y8PJqrSxpCPnsGowQ1Z/XrN5XbuMMrkG9s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719233385; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KW2K4lEnELwtLG0Du0+Zd4BIXmuwRSaKhU0g1LsZhUA=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=AJRb4307peY9QD4FY4mM8UP/2Ks2rBKItjyhcsiw9F/r6MpuG9O1iTXCFEY+zIYytZWz9SX6ulTxmEvz6KFaHyZATrSJ8Sh/JoPGGxoYBSt3KS4IgS8zjSQ+O3wQgk40hMP7cVJOE89zETR4opysH1py8Uabs1JKtV36IMQZ+3c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=OAf6pynk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Dq00BKlg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="OAf6pynk"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Dq00BKlg" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260581380261; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:49:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:49:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1719233383; x=1719319783; bh=Q8W2Cb9GFW M70Zj4xc8kK2Hh9EKM/M/jx4sXVXZP+3s=; b=OAf6pynk2o03dZJWLhP6GDlAxJ FMzfO/dvmu5fdm73KzJkM1LnqZGKiKn8CWVYsp3dmTWuDMIBIWoYhh6vr1PW7c6x X5LLN/7eWAiAuZTLwhw+VUqqHf/WvPmCXqJDig+xPglKZij5IPl5KtV2yQyAxnsD V1GG4MDIVSLDsKwjPsxPmBBV4u9O2xItNLnF0HYeDMjv9qLxKXMYzGjYQ50qHvmA N6s5NOtIl699D5DB1/+EIrhDEEBAP+IWmDeno9UkcqBqYZpcufjbu0upHnUzcXr2 Uwjk1/dGhC556BTXFBhLGJOUYuOfFFx3PBDQarsAG0OBGIbwBX3ZQVy/aeKw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1719233383; x=1719319783; bh=Q8W2Cb9GFWM70Zj4xc8kK2Hh9EKM /M/jx4sXVXZP+3s=; b=Dq00BKlgKaP2cR5obvsJardd5sHd9Ykq5efCVVGog+nY ejg8pe39LicQJvVJMJm98jFZiE0f5sU/BNIAmMZuBWD1s7b8wUOZH7IDRkxnwy9L 20pktHRucFeYXNE8Ov04HVCEA1mEOvh5mU9lzG3rsABEr3hCEeNYiqzxo9zeIYVR T+sGC+SoCmPqOmsC2r1jv3RZbqG/zCeNgo2QrLfN4qSqSFK+KJdLRzqz52+V6OCA dw0oNLNkKYuuWhoJa4+CFdfVM2wVo2hJrGCoZ1aiu6zdwVt1SmP5qMy7hluTdjHd XTdZ86xdE0oeOHzrvwGoKVglC+HKu92EOVB7LKAx2g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfeeguddgheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehr nhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffehueegteeihfegtefhjefgtdeugfegjeelheejueethfefgeeghfektdek teffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id C7FAFB60092; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:49:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-522-ga39cca1d5-fm-20240610.002-ga39cca1d Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <2b46da4c-fbe8-4b97-abf4-96aa7ddc1a9a@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240620162316.3674955-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20240620162316.3674955-10-arnd@kernel.org> <366548c1a0d9749e42c0d0c993414a353c9b0b02.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <9d4ba5e5-bb7f-432e-9354-47cc84eaa9e1@app.fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:49:20 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" , "Arnd Bergmann" , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rich Felker" , "Andreas Larsson" , guoren , "linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, "Helge Deller" , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, "Christophe Leroy" , "Naveen N. Rao" , "Heiko Carstens" , "musl@lists.openwall.com" , "Nicholas Piggin" , "Alexander Viro" , "LTP List" , "Brian Cain" , "Christian Brauner" , "Thomas Bogendoerfer" , "Xi Ruoyao" , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] sh: rework sync_file_range ABI Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 08:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:44, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> > Did you also check what order libc uses? I would expect libc on SuperH >> > misordering the >> > arguments as well unless I am missing something. Or do we know that the >> > code is actually >> > currently broken? >> >> Yes, I checked glibc, musl and uclibc-ng for all the cases in >> which the ABI made no sense, as well as to check that my analysis >> of the kernel sources matches the expectations of the libc. > > OK, awesome. > > Will you send a v2 so I can ack the updated version of the patch? > > I'm also fine with the patch going through your tree, as I would > like to start with the changes for v6.11 this week. I should be able to get a v2 out today and apply that to my asm-generic tree to have in linux-next before I send the pull request. Arnd