From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
steven.price@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, gshan@redhat.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: realm: Fix DMA address for devices
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:35:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b6d5287-bdea-4ec3-a07f-986bd3c3b285@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250227144150.1667735-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Hi Marek,
On 27/02/2025 14:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Linux can be run as a Confidential Guest in Arm CCA from Linux v6.13. The address
> space (GPA or IPA) of a Realm VM is split into two halves, with private bottom
> half and shared top half. In Linux we treat the "top" bit of the IPA space as
> an attribute, to indicate whether it is shared or not (MSB == 1 implies shared).
> Stage2 (GPA to PA) translations used by the CPU accesses, cover the full IPA space,
> and are managed by RMM. The "top" bit as attribute is only a software construct.
>
> At present any device passed through to a Realm is treated as untrusted and the
> Realm uses bounce buffering for any DMA, using the "decrypted" (shared) DMA
> buffers (i.e., IPA with top bit set). In Linux, we only send the "DMA" address
> masking the "top" bit. In Arm CCA, SMMU for untrusted devices are managed by the
> non-secure Host and thus it can be confusing for the host/device when an unmasked
> address is provided. Given there could be other hypervisors than Linux/KVM
> running Arm CCA guests, the Realm Guest must adhere to a single convention for
> the DMA address. This gets further complicated when we add support for trusted
> devices, which can DMA into the full Realm memory space, once accepted. Thus,
> a DMA masked address (with "top" bit lost) will prevent a trusted device from
> accessing a shared buffer.
>
> To resolve this Arm has decided to standardise the DMA address used by the Realm
> to include the full IPA address bits (including the "top" bit, which Linux uses
> as an attribute). This implies, any DMA to a shared buffer must have the top bit
> of the IPA space set.
>
> There is already a provision to do this in phys_to_dma* and dma_to_phys(), but
> that is specific to AMD SME and is quite the opposite of what we need for Arm CCA.
> i.e., For Arm CCA we need to set the bit for "decrypted" DMA and clear the bit
> for "encrypted".
>
> This series converts the existing __sme_* helpers to a bit more generalised versions :
> dma_addr_decrypted() and dma_encrypted(). Also, while converting a DMA address back
> to CPU physical address requires clearing off any "encryption/decryption" bits.
> I have named this "dma_addr_canonical()". (The other options are :
> * dma_addr_clear_encryption - Well, not just for encryption, but we clear decryption
> too, so not ideal.
> * dma_addr_normal
> * dma_addr_clear
> * dma_addr_default
>
> This also implies that the VMMs must take care to :
>
> 1. Create the S2-SMMU mappings for VFIO at the "unprotected" alias.
> 2. Always mask the "top" bit off any IPA it receives from the Realm for DMA.
> KVM already does that today and no changes are required.
>
> A kvmtool branch with the changes above is available here [1]. There are two
> patches [2] & [3], that are really required on top of the Arm CCA support.
>
> Ideally it would be good to get this backported to v6.13 stable kernel releases
> to make sure that they are compliant with this change.
>
Please could you take a look at this series and let us know your
thoughts ? If you are happy with the changes, are you happy to pull
this through the DMA MAP tree ? The relevant bits have been reviewed/
acked by people (arm64 and AMD bits).
Kind regards
Suzuki
> Changes since v2:
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250219220751.1276854-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com
> - Collect Acks & Reviews for Patch 1
> - Rename helpers
> dma_encrypted => dma_addr_encrypted
> dma_decrypted => dma_addr_unencrypted
> dma_clear_encryption => dma_addr_canonical
> - For Arm CCA, use PROT_NS_SHARED, set/clear only the top IPA bit.
> - Drop dma_addr_encrypted() helper for Arm CCA as it is a NOP
>
> Changes since v1
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250212171411.951874-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com
> - Follow Robin's suggestion to generalise the DMA address conversion helpers
> to provide dma_{encrypte,decrypted,clear_encryption}. See PATCH 2 for more
> details.
> - Add a fix to the ordering of "__sme_clr" for dma_to_phys (PATCH 1)
>
> [1] git@git.gitlab.arm.com:linux-arm/kvmtool-cca.git cca/guest-dma-alias/v1
> [2] https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/kvmtool-cca/-/commit/ea37a6eb968abe4c75be4a8a90808714657c2ef7
> [3] https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/kvmtool-cca/-/commit/8afd0d5e6a7ee444dd0c1565fe94ecd831054a29
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>
> Suzuki K Poulose (3):
> dma: Fix encryption bit clearing for dma_to_phys
> dma: Introduce generic dma_addr_*crypted helpers
> arm64: realm: Use aliased addresses for device DMA to shared buffers
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 11 +++++++++++
> include/linux/dma-direct.h | 13 +++++++++----
> include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-27 14:41 Suzuki K Poulose
2025-02-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dma: Fix encryption bit clearing for dma_to_phys Suzuki K Poulose
2025-02-28 2:08 ` Gavin Shan
2025-02-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dma: Introduce generic dma_addr_*crypted helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2025-02-28 2:09 ` Gavin Shan
2025-02-28 18:23 ` Robin Murphy
2025-02-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: realm: Use aliased addresses for device DMA to shared buffers Suzuki K Poulose
2025-02-27 16:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-27 17:03 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-02-28 2:08 ` Gavin Shan
2025-03-03 14:16 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-03 11:35 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2025-03-04 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: realm: Fix DMA address for devices Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-06 11:39 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-03-06 18:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-11 11:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-03-11 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b6d5287-bdea-4ec3-a07f-986bd3c3b285@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®