From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
Miko.Lenczewski@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 0/4] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 13:57:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b816a20-a0ce-43b2-b76f-d9e175913b27@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5491098f-5508-4665-a8dc-b91a950bbc02@arm.com>
On 6/16/25 2:09 AM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 13/06/2025 18:21, Yang Shi wrote:
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> Gently ping... any comments for this version?
> Hi Yang, yes sorry for slow response - It's been in my queue. I'm going to start
> looking at it now and plan to get you some feedback in the next couple of days.
>
>> It looks Dev's series is getting stable except some nits. I went through his
>> patches and all the call sites for changing page permission. They are:
>> 1. change_memory_common(): called by set_memory_{ro|rw|x|nx}. It iterates
>> every single page mapped in the vm area then change permission on page basis. It
>> depends on whether the vm area is block mapped or not if we want to change
>> permission on block mapping.
>> 2. set_memory_valid(): it looks it assumes the [addr, addr + size) range is
>> mapped contiguously, but it depends on the callers pass in block size (nr > 1).
>> There are two sub cases:
>> 2.a kfence and debugalloc just work for PTE mapping, so they pass in single
>> page.
>> 2.b The execmem passes in large page on x86, arm64 has not supported huge
>> execmem cache yet, so it should still pass in singe page for the time being. But
>> my series + Dev's series can handle both single page mapping and block mapping well
>> for this case. So changing permission for block mapping can be
>> supported automatically once arm64 supports huge execmem cache.
>> 3. set_direct_map_{invalid|default}_noflush(): it looks they are page basis.
>> So Dev's series has no change to them.
>> 4. realm: if I remember correctly, realm forces PTE mapping for linear address
>> space all the time, so no impact.
> Yes for realm, we currently force PTE mapping - that's because we need page
> granularity for sharing certain portions back to the host. But with this work I
> think we will be able to do the splitting on the fly and map using big blocks
> even for realms.
OK, it is good to support more usecase.
>> So it looks like just #1 may need some extra work. But it seems simple. I should
>> just need advance the address range in (1 << vm's order) stride. So there should
>> be just some minor changes when I rebase my patches on top of Dev's, mainly
>> context changes. It has no impact to the split primitive and repainting linear
>> mapping.
> I haven't looked at your series yet, but I had assumed that the most convenient
> (and only) integration point would be to call your split primitive from dev's
> ___change_memory_common() (note 3 underscores at beginning). Something like this:
>
> ___change_memory_common(unsigned long start, unsigned long size, ...)
> {
> // This will need to return error for case where splitting would have
> // been required but system does not support BBML2_NOABORT
> ret = split_mapping_granularity(start, start + size)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> ...
> }
Yeah, I agree. All callsites converge to ___change_memory_common() once
Dev's series is applied.
Thanks,
Yang
>> Thanks,
>> Yang
>>
>>
>> On 5/30/25 7:41 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> Changelog
>>> =========
>>> v4:
>>> * Rebased to v6.15-rc4.
>>> * Based on Miko's latest BBML2 cpufeature patch (https://lore.kernel.org/
>>> linux-arm-kernel/20250428153514.55772-4-miko.lenczewski@arm.com/).
>>> * Keep block mappings rather than splitting to PTEs if it is fully contained
>>> per Ryan.
>>> * Return -EINVAL if page table allocation failed instead of BUG_ON per Ryan.
>>> * When page table allocation failed, return -1 instead of 0 per Ryan.
>>> * Allocate page table with GFP_ATOMIC for repainting per Ryan.
>>> * Use idmap to wait for repainting is done per Ryan.
>>> * Some minor fixes per the discussion for v3.
>>> * Some clean up to reduce redundant code.
>>>
>>> v3:
>>> * Rebased to v6.14-rc4.
>>> * Based on Miko's BBML2 cpufeature patch (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
>>> arm-kernel/20250228182403.6269-3-miko.lenczewski@arm.com/).
>>> Also included in this series in order to have the complete patchset.
>>> * Enhanced __create_pgd_mapping() to handle split as well per Ryan.
>>> * Supported CONT mappings per Ryan.
>>> * Supported asymmetric system by splitting kernel linear mapping if such
>>> system is detected per Ryan. I don't have such system to test, so the
>>> testing is done by hacking kernel to call linear mapping repainting
>>> unconditionally. The linear mapping doesn't have any block and cont
>>> mappings after booting.
>>>
>>> RFC v2:
>>> * Used allowlist to advertise BBM lv2 on the CPUs which can handle TLB
>>> conflict gracefully per Will Deacon
>>> * Rebased onto v6.13-rc5
>>> *https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250103011822.1257189-1-
>>> yang@os.amperecomputing.com/
>>>
>>> v3:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250304222018.615808-1-
>>> yang@os.amperecomputing.com/
>>> RFC v2:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250103011822.1257189-1-
>>> yang@os.amperecomputing.com/
>>> RFC v1:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241118181711.962576-1-
>>> yang@os.amperecomputing.com/
>>>
>>> Description
>>> ===========
>>> When rodata=full kernel linear mapping is mapped by PTE due to arm's
>>> break-before-make rule.
>>>
>>> A number of performance issues arise when the kernel linear map is using
>>> PTE entries due to arm's break-before-make rule:
>>> - performance degradation
>>> - more TLB pressure
>>> - memory waste for kernel page table
>>>
>>> These issues can be avoided by specifying rodata=on the kernel command
>>> line but this disables the alias checks on page table permissions and
>>> therefore compromises security somewhat.
>>>
>>> With FEAT_BBM level 2 support it is no longer necessary to invalidate the
>>> page table entry when changing page sizes. This allows the kernel to
>>> split large mappings after boot is complete.
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for splitting large mappings when FEAT_BBM level 2
>>> is available and rodata=full is used. This functionality will be used
>>> when modifying page permissions for individual page frames.
>>>
>>> Without FEAT_BBM level 2 we will keep the kernel linear map using PTEs
>>> only.
>>>
>>> If the system is asymmetric, the kernel linear mapping may be repainted once
>>> the BBML2 capability is finalized on all CPUs. See patch #4 for more details.
>>>
>>> We saw significant performance increases in some benchmarks with
>>> rodata=full without compromising the security features of the kernel.
>>>
>>> Testing
>>> =======
>>> The test was done on AmpereOne machine (192 cores, 1P) with 256GB memory and
>>> 4K page size + 48 bit VA.
>>>
>>> Function test (4K/16K/64K page size)
>>> - Kernel boot. Kernel needs change kernel linear mapping permission at
>>> boot stage, if the patch didn't work, kernel typically didn't boot.
>>> - Module stress from stress-ng. Kernel module load change permission for
>>> linear mapping.
>>> - A test kernel module which allocates 80% of total memory via vmalloc(),
>>> then change the vmalloc area permission to RO, this also change linear
>>> mapping permission to RO, then change it back before vfree(). Then launch
>>> a VM which consumes almost all physical memory.
>>> - VM with the patchset applied in guest kernel too.
>>> - Kernel build in VM with guest kernel which has this series applied.
>>> - rodata=on. Make sure other rodata mode is not broken.
>>> - Boot on the machine which doesn't support BBML2.
>>>
>>> Performance
>>> ===========
>>> Memory consumption
>>> Before:
>>> MemTotal: 258988984 kB
>>> MemFree: 254821700 kB
>>>
>>> After:
>>> MemTotal: 259505132 kB
>>> MemFree: 255410264 kB
>>>
>>> Around 500MB more memory are free to use. The larger the machine, the
>>> more memory saved.
>>>
>>> Performance benchmarking
>>> * Memcached
>>> We saw performance degradation when running Memcached benchmark with
>>> rodata=full vs rodata=on. Our profiling pointed to kernel TLB pressure.
>>> With this patchset we saw ops/sec is increased by around 3.5%, P99
>>> latency is reduced by around 9.6%.
>>> The gain mainly came from reduced kernel TLB misses. The kernel TLB
>>> MPKI is reduced by 28.5%.
>>>
>>> The benchmark data is now on par with rodata=on too.
>>>
>>> * Disk encryption (dm-crypt) benchmark
>>> Ran fio benchmark with the below command on a 128G ramdisk (ext4) with disk
>>> encryption (by dm-crypt with no read/write workqueue).
>>> fio --directory=/data --random_generator=lfsr --norandommap --randrepeat 1 \
>>> --status-interval=999 --rw=write --bs=4k --loops=1 --ioengine=sync \
>>> --iodepth=1 --numjobs=1 --fsync_on_close=1 --group_reporting --thread \
>>> --name=iops-test-job --eta-newline=1 --size 100G
>>>
>>> The IOPS is increased by 90% - 150% (the variance is high, but the worst
>>> number of good case is around 90% more than the best number of bad case).
>>> The bandwidth is increased and the avg clat is reduced proportionally.
>>>
>>> * Sequential file read
>>> Read 100G file sequentially on XFS (xfs_io read with page cache populated).
>>> The bandwidth is increased by 150%.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yang Shi (4):
>>> arm64: cpufeature: add AmpereOne to BBML2 allow list
>>> arm64: mm: make __create_pgd_mapping() and helpers non-void
>>> arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full
>>> arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 is not supported on secondary
>>> CPUs
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 26 +++++++
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 4 +
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 12 ++-
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 30 ++++++--
>>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 505 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> +---------------
>>> arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 37 +++++++--
>>> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 41 ++++++++++
>>> 7 files changed, 585 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-31 2:41 Yang Shi
2025-05-31 2:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: cpufeature: add AmpereOne to BBML2 allow list Yang Shi
2025-05-31 2:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: mm: make __create_pgd_mapping() and helpers non-void Yang Shi
2025-06-16 10:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-17 21:11 ` Yang Shi
2025-06-23 13:05 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-31 2:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: mm: support large block mapping when rodata=full Yang Shi
2025-06-16 11:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-16 12:33 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-17 21:01 ` Yang Shi
2025-06-16 16:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-17 21:09 ` Yang Shi
2025-06-23 13:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-23 19:12 ` Yang Shi
2025-06-26 22:39 ` Yang Shi
2025-07-23 17:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-23 20:51 ` Yang Shi
2025-07-24 11:43 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-24 17:59 ` Yang Shi
2025-05-31 2:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: mm: split linear mapping if BBML2 is not supported on secondary CPUs Yang Shi
2025-06-23 12:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-23 20:56 ` Yang Shi
2025-06-13 17:21 ` [v4 PATCH 0/4] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full Yang Shi
2025-06-16 9:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-17 20:57 ` Yang Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b816a20-a0ce-43b2-b76f-d9e175913b27@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=Miko.Lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®