From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vschneid@redhat.com" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: 答复: [????] Re: divide error in x86 and cputime
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 00:23:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b98f7946cd0411ab588ce9b55c2f8e2@baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ef88def90634827bac1874d90e0e329@baidu.com>
> non-x86 system maybe has same issue, once (stime + utime) overflows 64bit,
> mul_u64_u64_div_u64 from lib/math/div64.c maybe cause division by 0
>
Correct this, mul_u64_u64_div_u64(0x69f98da9ba980c00, 0xfffd213aabd74626, 0x009e00900) oflib/math/div64.c returns 0xffffffffffffffff
> so to cputime, could cputime_adjust() return stime if stime if stime + utime is
> overflow
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c index
> 6dab4854..db0c273 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -579,6 +579,10 @@ void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr, struct
> prev_cputime *prev,
> goto update;
> }
>
> + if (stime > (stime + utime)) {
> + goto update;
> + }
> +
> stime = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(stime, rtime, stime + utime);
> /*
> * Because mul_u64_u64_div_u64() can approximate on some
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -Li
>
>
> > Oleg.
> >
> > On 07/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 07/07, Li,Rongqing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [78250815.703847] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > It caused by a process with many threads running very long, and
> > > > utime+stime overflowed 64bit, then cause the below div
> > > >
> > > > mul_u64_u64_div_u64(0x69f98da9ba980c00, 0xfffd213aabd74626,
> > > > 0x09e00900);
> > > >
> > > > I see the comments of mul_u64_u64_div_u64() say:
> > > >
> > > > Will generate an #DE when the result doesn't fit u64, could fix
> > > > with an __ex_table[] entry when it becomes an issu
> > > >
> > > > Seem __ex_table[] entry for div does not work ?
> > >
> > > Well, the current version doesn't have an __ex_table[] entry for div...
> > >
> > > I do not know what can/should we do in this case... Perhaps
> > >
> > > static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 mul, u64 div)
> > > {
> > > int ok = 0;
> > > u64 q;
> > >
> > > asm ("mulq %3; 1: divq %4; movl $1,%1; 2:\n"
> > > _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)
> > > : "=a" (q), "+r" (ok)
> > > : "a" (a), "rm" (mul), "rm" (div)
> > > : "rdx");
> > >
> > > return ok ? q : -1ul;
> > > }
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Should return ULLONG_MAX on #DE.
> > >
> > > Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 8:14 Li,Rongqing
2025-07-07 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-07 22:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-07-07 22:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-07 22:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-07 23:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-07-08 11:00 ` David Laight
2025-07-08 1:40 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-07-08 1:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 1:58 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-07-08 2:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-07-08 9:58 ` David Laight
2025-07-07 22:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-07-07 23:41 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-07-07 23:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 0:10 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-07-08 0:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 1:17 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-07-08 1:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 10:35 ` [????] Re: [????] " David Laight
2025-07-08 11:12 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-07-08 0:23 ` Li,Rongqing [this message]
2026-01-04 13:23 ` 答复: " Xia Fukun
2026-01-04 14:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-01-04 18:15 ` David Laight
2026-01-04 20:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-01-04 22:03 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b98f7946cd0411ab588ce9b55c2f8e2@baidu.com \
--to=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®