mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Youling Tang <tangyouling@kylinos.cn>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, mengqinggang@loongson.cn,
	cailulu@loongson.cn, wanglei@loongson.cn, luweining@loongson.cn,
	Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>,
	Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loongarch: Only select HAVE_OBJTOOL and allow ORC unwinder if the inline assembler supports R_LARCH_{32,64}_PCREL
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:14:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bd6ae20-ec56-c1a2-c5dd-e8c978a376d3@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96a2e8a80c06772b64fcbdba42e1dae2d68a53a7.camel@xry111.site>


On 2024-06-07 13:42, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 10:10 +0800, Jinyang He wrote:
>> What I just confused is that there is no ".cfi_*"
>> in the eplogue by clang, which may cause wrong backtrace if gdb set
>>
>> breakpoint there and backtrace. (But this is out of this topic.)
> I don't think it'll cause wrong backtrace.  The real assemble code has
> restored the registers and missing .cfi_restore will just make unwinder
> restore them again.  There are redundant works but not breakages.

$ cat hello.c:
extern void __attribute__((noinline)) foo() {}
int main() {
   foo();
   return (int)(long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
}
$ clang hello.c -S -g -o hello.s -O0 -fPIC
$ cat hello.s:
[...]
         addi.d  $sp, $sp, -32
         .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
         st.d    $ra, $sp, 24                    # 8-byte Folded Spill
         st.d    $fp, $sp, 16                    # 8-byte Folded Spill
         .cfi_offset 1, -8
         .cfi_offset 22, -16
         addi.d  $fp, $sp, 32
         .cfi_def_cfa 22, 0
         move    $a0, $zero
         st.w    $a0, $fp, -20
.Ltmp2:
         .loc    0 3 3 prologue_end              # hello.c:3:3
         bl      %plt(foo)
         .loc    0 4 21                          # hello.c:4:21
         move    $a0, $fp
         .loc    0 4 3 is_stmt 0                 # hello.c:4:3
         addi.w  $a0, $a0, 0
         ld.d    $fp, $sp, 16                    # 8-byte Folded Reload
<use gdb and set break ponint there>
         ld.d    $ra, $sp, 24                    # 8-byte Folded Reload
         .loc    0 4 3 epilogue_begin            # hello.c:4:3
         addi.d  $sp, $sp, 32
         ret
[...]

So how unwinder do if we <use gdb and set break ponint there>? I think
if we not give ".cfi_restore 22" or others info, it will consider
   1) the $ra is in cfa-8
   2) the cfa is $fp
So it will get $ra by $ra = *(long*)($fp-8). So it may unwind failed
because $fp has been restored and not the CFA now.

> For objtool the main difference seems a thing explained in
> https://maskray.me/blog/2020-11-08-stack-unwinding by Fangrui:
>
>     Note: on RISC-V and LoongArch, the stack slot for the previous frame
>     pointer is stored at fp[-2] instead of fp[0]. See [Consider
>     standardising which stack slot fp points
>     to](https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/issues/18)
>     for the RISC-V discussion.

In most cases the $fp is saved at cfa-16. But for va args, something
becomes different at LoongArch (I do not know the case of riscv), the
$fp isn't saved at cfa-16. (e.g. printk?)

> So perhaps we just need to code a constant named "PREV_BP_OFFSET"
Can you give some detail?
>   or
> something in arch/ and use it in update_cfi_state() instead of fully re-
> implement the entire function?

I feel that the update_cfi_state should be arch specific. I believe
that some logic can be reused, but each arch may have its own logic.


Thanks,
Jinyang


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-07  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-04 15:07 Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-05  1:52 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-05  4:38   ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-05  5:21     ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-05  5:25       ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-05  2:04 ` Heng Qi
2024-06-05  5:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-06-05  5:54   ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-05  6:25     ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-06-05 10:57       ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-05 13:18         ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-05 15:13           ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-05 15:47             ` Jinyang He
2024-06-05 19:05               ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-06  2:10                 ` Jinyang He
2024-06-07  5:42                   ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-07  7:14                     ` Jinyang He [this message]
2024-06-07  8:29                       ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-15  8:45                         ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-15  8:53                           ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-15  9:33                             ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-15 10:22                               ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-17 13:11                                 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-17 13:38                                   ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-17 13:47                                     ` Huacai Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2bd6ae20-ec56-c1a2-c5dd-e8c978a376d3@loongson.cn \
    --to=hejinyang@loongson.cn \
    --cc=cailulu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luweining@loongson.cn \
    --cc=mengqinggang@loongson.cn \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tangyouling@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wanglei@loongson.cn \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®