mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <lgoncalv@redhat.com>, <yilun.xu@intel.com>, <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	<matthew.gerlach@intel.com>, <basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@intel.com>,
	<tianfei.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/8] firmware_loader: Clear data and size in fw_free_paged_buf
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:09:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bd89743-78b8-0e1a-bbda-10d2fedb863f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ec3e671-53aa-b8cc-1360-c454f3db277d@redhat.com>

Hi Tom,

On 3/28/22 06:27, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 3/23/22 4:33 PM, Russ Weight wrote:
>> The fw_free_paged_buf() function resets the paged buffer information in
>> the fw_priv data structure. Additionally, clear the data and size members
>> of fw_priv in order to facilitate the reuse of fw_priv. This is being
>> done in preparation for enabling userspace to initiate multiple firmware
>> uploads using this sysfs interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
>> ---
>> v1:
>>    - No change from RFC patch
>> ---
>>   drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c
>> index 94d1789a233e..2cc11d93753a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c
>> @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ void fw_free_paged_buf(struct fw_priv *fw_priv)
>
> Why isn't a vfree needed or realloc done?

The free and realloc support was present prior to my changes. The page
buffer support was designed such that if a firmware write was cancelled, the
existing fw_priv structure could be re-used for another write in the context
of the same firmware upload. However, there was no prior case for completing
a write and then reusing the fw_priv structure for subsequent firmware writes;
fw_priv previously had a one-time use. The changes I have made are to enable
the re-use of the fw_priv structure.

Initially, fw_priv->data is NULL. The "realloc" functionality happens during
the write of the data binary attribute here:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/ae085d7f9365de7da27ab5c0d16b12d51ea7fca9/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c#L426

The fw_priv->data pointer remains NULL until all data is written and the
user writes '0' to the loading attribute. The fw_priv->data pointer is set in
fw_map_paged_buf() which is called here:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/ae085d7f9365de7da27ab5c0d16b12d51ea7fca9/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c#L274

In the unmodified code, the fw_priv->data pointer is never cleared. My changes
reset the pointer to NULL after the memory is released so that the fw_priv can
be resused.

The new firmware-upload happens in the context of a kernel worker thread and the work
function is fw_upload_main(). At the end of fw_upload_main(), fw_free_paged_buf()
is called to do the free. This is the function that is being modified by the lines
below. This function calls "__free_page(fw_priv->pages[i])" in a loop to free the
memory pages. It also calls "vunmap(fw_priv->data)" to free the virtual mapping.
You can see the unmodified implementation of this function here:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/ae085d7f9365de7da27ab5c0d16b12d51ea7fca9/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c#L241

- Russ

>
> Tom
>
>>       fw_priv->pages = NULL;
>>       fw_priv->page_array_size = 0;
>>       fw_priv->nr_pages = 0;
>> +    fw_priv->data = NULL;
>> +    fw_priv->size = 0;
>>   }
>>     int fw_grow_paged_buf(struct fw_priv *fw_priv, int pages_needed)
>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-28 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-23 23:33 [RESEND PATCH v1 0/8] Extend FW framework for user FW uploads Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 1/8] firmware_loader: Clear data and size in fw_free_paged_buf Russ Weight
2022-03-28 13:27   ` Tom Rix
2022-03-28 18:09     ` Russ Weight [this message]
2022-03-28 18:52       ` Tom Rix
2022-03-28 20:08         ` Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 2/8] firmware_loader: Check fw_state_is_done in loading_store Russ Weight
2022-04-02 14:47   ` Tom Rix
2022-04-14 23:41     ` Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 3/8] firmware_loader: Split sysfs support from fallback Russ Weight
2022-04-02 15:15   ` Tom Rix
2022-04-15  0:39     ` Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 4/8] firmware_loader: Add firmware-upload support Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 5/8] firmware_loader: Add sysfs nodes to monitor fw_upload Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 6/8] test_firmware: Add test support for firmware upload Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 7/8] test_firmware: Error injection " Russ Weight
2022-03-23 23:33 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 8/8] selftests: firmware: Add firmware upload selftests Russ Weight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2bd89743-78b8-0e1a-bbda-10d2fedb863f@intel.com \
    --to=russell.h.weight@intel.com \
    --cc=basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@intel.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tianfei.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®