From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423194AbXDXWZn (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:25:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423167AbXDXWY6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:24:58 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:36847 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423192AbXDXWYx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:24:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qjGlOUUo+Z6NG+ncPZo5kJIl0scsjNLvXn89qaWb0m47p01mIuBLgV3UeFgLZB2ZOshOi43xZGxQpGC9v+m+iKZaOGpEVJLV0gJnMddzWxeHfss7MB3frkr5Bei/JLDURk/j+9U/5SdYvKdbDpeGDVBKsoJ+LertZZcRF1CNr9o= Message-ID: <2c0942db0704241524r46e02657q22141ae07d5296fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:24:52 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" Reply-To: ray-gmail@madrabbit.org To: "Pavel Machek" Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Nigel Cunningham" , "Christian Hesse" , "Nick Piggin" , "Mike Galbraith" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Con Kolivas" , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, "Andrew Morton" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Arjan van de Ven" In-Reply-To: <20070424212956.GE16457@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070413202100.GA9957@elte.hu> <20070418211632.GA7610@elte.hu> <200704182357.28107.mail@earthworm.de> <20070418220228.GA14536@elte.hu> <1176947576.5906.21.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <20070419070437.GA25211@elte.hu> <20070424202336.GC16503@elf.ucw.cz> <20070424205416.GA23032@elte.hu> <20070424212956.GE16457@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/24/07, Pavel Machek wrote: > > so, while it's probably apples to oranges, uswsusp seems to be larger, > > while there's at least one feature that it is missing. > > (We are talking "save 100% memory" here). > > As I said, that one feature is doable in uswsusp, too. It is 200 > lines. It also makes mm <-> swsusp interaction _way_ more complex, and Sounds like the perfect reason to put that in kernel space. Ray