From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933455AbXEEUqQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 16:46:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933463AbXEEUqQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 16:46:16 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:27813 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933455AbXEEUqO (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 16:46:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=aIpDH+7mCsratYWu9UA6S8w3ojG9hImgVVnhNoN1tFhV7ioW4Sqe0DlUBPX7RvQ4qx9CSyvTSC2TP39pQV9dFe1PUxl6qbvzg4HIKOI548NCACF7OUX58eYNVzIcrCuH+a9BOC3Wqr2IKCUzx0HxLEnS5ZDaLX+0Xv42dIFNc98= Message-ID: <2c0942db0705051346jabd14bam170cf4cf8b54d473@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:46:14 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH] swsusp: Change code ordering related to ACPI Cc: LKML , "Andrew Morton" , "Marcus Better" , "Pavel Machek" , "Tobias Diedrich" , "pm list" In-Reply-To: <200705051150.22108.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200705041143.02451.rjw@sisk.pl> <2c0942db0705041611u2d82fbb7m4719c1bcf8bcdbf7@mail.gmail.com> <200705051150.22108.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2436f7521b380d10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/5/07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, 5 May 2007 01:11, Ray Lee wrote: > > On 5/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The change of the hibernation/suspend code ordering made before 2.6.21 has > > > caused some systems to have problems related to ACPI. In particular, the > > > 'platform' hibernation mode doesn't work any more on some systems. > > > > It seems that somewhere between 2.6.21-rc4 and 2.6.21 final my laptop > > stopped being able to come out of suspend to RAM. Before I start > > bisecting (again, sigh), is this ringing any bells for anyone? In > > particular your, patch (snipped) that deals with hibernation, would it > > also affect suspend to RAM? > > Not this particular one, but you may try to move pm_finish() after > resume_console() in kernel/power/main.c:suspend_prepare() and see if that > helps. > > If it doesn't help, then try to compile the kernel with NO_HZ and > HIGH_RES_TIMERS unset. If that doesn't help, you may try with HPET_TIMER > unset additionally. Okay, my system is doing it with a known good kernel as well (2.6.21-rc4), so this is something else. Please ignore my report for now. In the meantime, I'll be downgrading my hal and drm to what they were a week ago to see if that fixes the problem. (I knew better than to change more than one thing at a time, really I did. Sigh.) Thanks for your help regardless, Ray