From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765551AbXG2PDa (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:03:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763947AbXG2O6J (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:58:09 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:26259 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763908AbXG2O6H (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:58:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=GNOuXzAoWjvvUSG64ZLyVA0PFlbH31ATzkd81d1W8/O34zyBA7cBsM/1GZC7D3huy/BrFM2zMOCoIcCSzyV9r7OzT2uiik6VgB7fek3aDeZ+uj5nFo/iz+jcqoO2zZYfawpqxoJrbtSR1oNKieaj9VO05+aEiNsuU0DdyS5As1I= Message-ID: <2c0942db0707290758p39fef2e8o68d67bec5c7ba6ab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 07:58:05 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" To: "Rene Herman" Subject: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23] Cc: "Alan Cox" , david@lang.hm, "Daniel Hazelton" , "Mike Galbraith" , "Andrew Morton" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Frank Kingswood" , "Andi Kleen" , "Nick Piggin" , "Jesper Juhl" , "ck list" , "Paul Jackson" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <46AC9F2C.8090601@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9a8748490707231608h453eefffx68b9c391897aba70@mail.gmail.com> <46AA3680.4010508@gmail.com> <46AAEDEB.7040003@gmail.com> <46AB166A.2000300@gmail.com> <20070728122139.3c7f4290@the-village.bc.nu> <46AC4B97.5050708@gmail.com> <20070729141215.08973d54@the-village.bc.nu> <46AC9F2C.8090601@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0abf98d84a411af8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/29/07, Rene Herman wrote: > On 07/29/2007 03:12 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > More radically if anyone wants to do real researchy type work - how about > > log structured swap with a cleaner ? > > Right over my head. Why does log-structure help anything? Log structured disk layouts allow for better placement of writeout, so that you cn eliminate most or all seeks. Seeks are the enemy when trying to get full disk bandwidth. google on log structured disk layout, or somesuch, for details. Ray