From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756204AbYEKRWx (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 13:22:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752079AbYEKRWo (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 13:22:44 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:14357 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751245AbYEKRWn (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 13:22:43 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=p8pkz55+H1ocJyjuUVVdL+7aUzuPd6Axuz7upgH13oGuBjAAZk/UcVOB+7+MyaK4NUtgHXbuqMhqj5kAaoe8EXTtp23R5pEhQWF01EeeRmqVROOyo2pmnQEOBnV1uud7JXeygcte77FtL4H+lzkdco0RlCSsxX44L3QfsAn63bM= Message-ID: <2c0942db0805111022p5c977cdw75aaf10caed7ee7e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 10:22:42 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" To: "Adrian Bunk" Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/sched*: optimize inlining Cc: "Andreas Mohr" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080511125221.GF1645@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080511092132.GE1645@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080511111820.GA3326@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20080511125221.GF1645@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> X-Google-Sender-Auth: acf432af4e68b468 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 01:18:20PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > If you didn't complain when "x86: add optimized inlining" got into > Linus' tree you can't validly complain about my patch. You would fail a course in logic. Please read up on "The fallacy of division" (aka Fallacy of decomposition), and try your argument again.